Apotex - contamination     www.apotexholocaust.com            www.pharmaholocaust.com
I live like a walking death in twilight zone / some where in between death and a life being deprived of all Human Rights and Constitutional / Law 
protection by habitual offenders. I was assessed by three (3) independent psychiatrists to eliminate offender's speculations about my insanity 
prompting "delusions" etc. All psychiatrists stated clearly, that I am sane /I do NOT have/had any mental illness. No family history of any.
To Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal

To Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal
Toronto, Ontario,

November 02/2011

Re: WSIAT#: WSiB #:

Dear Sir / Madam,

Thank you very much for very professional preparation of my Case Record - 
Addendum 2.
It did contain 410 Pages of my critical allegations supported by hard 
evidence which you forwarded to Apotex's Counsel - Carl Peterson (Filion 
Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and a copy of it to Apotex.

Tribunal asked Apotex's Counsel Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup 
Angeletti LLP) to respond with in three- week rule - by November 01/2011.
On Nov. 01/2011 I received copy of Counsel's respond to WSIAT on TWO 
PAGES - half blank.
Counsel totally ignored ( as in previous Cases with other Agencies) every 
thing provided.

Apotex / Counsel express consent to the Oral Hearing proceedings being 
conducted with out my personal presence BUT at the same time objects to the 
matter proceeding in writing AS I REQUESTED.
How Counsel wants to get legitimacy to the Oral Hearing with out my personal 
participation?
He wants again arbitrarily impose his own fraudulent interpretations of 
evidence, this time on WSIAT forum.
DUE TO MY MEDICAL CONDITIONS ONLY PROCEEDING IN WRITING CAN BE UNBIASSED 
/JUST AND BINDING.
Counsel reiterates, that IN HIS OPINION all issues are predominantly 
medical, involving INTERPRETATION OF MY MEDICAL REPORTS and a review of my 
job duties.

Despite request, that in accordance with the Tribunal's Practice Direction :

1. IT IS NOT THE TRIBUNAL'S USUAL PRACTICE TO CALL A DOCTOR AS A WITNESS.
IN MOST CASES THE REPORT FROM THE DOCTOR IS SUFFICIENT.

2. IF YOUR EVIDENCE INCLUDES A REPORT OF A DOCTOR OR OTHER EXPERT THAT HAS 
BEEN SPECIFICALLY PREPARED FOR YOUR APPEAL, YOU MUST SUBMIT A COPY OF THE 
CURRICULUM VITAE (QUALIFICATIONS) OF THE DOCTOR OR EXPERT AND A COPY OF A 
LETTER SEND TO THE DOCTOR OR EXPERT REQUESTING THE REPORT (testimony). 
Counsel did not/ does not provide any of those.

3. YOU MUST PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT ALL YOUR WITNESSES. IT WILL NOT BE 
ALLOWED TO HAVE ANY WITNESSES WHO ARE NOT LISTED etc.
Apotex's Counsel did NOT provide any of requested info to the Tribunal and 
instead provided false information about own witnesses.
Some of them are fraudulent while others are former Apotex's victims 
(dependent on Apotex's handouts for survival /lively hood )forced to 
testify. All of them are not in position to provide a more sophisticated nor 
comprehensive understanding of the facts in my Claims File nor to challenge 
my first hand knowledge / provided hard evidence.

As in Dr. Olivieri's Case, Apotex / Counsel wants to invent new /own 
meanings of words/definitions of diagnosis and argue that white is black and 
black is white.
Further Counsel states, that Apotex's position is , that since the issues 
raised are primarily medical, the matter can proceed by way of Oral Hearing 
with out me/ a victim ( but not in writing).
Further he imposes on Tribunal his will by quotation:"The Tribunal will hold 
an oral hearing with out a worker present where the issues raised are 
primarily medical".
He omits issues of CRIMINAL NATURE, ISSUES OF BRIDGE OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 
TORTURE, CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES AND EVERY THING ELSE WHAT I DO ALLEGE.

Counsel provides some vogue examples of cases even remotely not reflecting 
my situation.

HE ACTS AGAINST LAW WHICH STATES: "Savings and Restructuring Act introduced 
Amendments to the Employment Standards Act (ESA) clarifying or strengthening 
the rights of WORKERS.
The Act stipulated to discontinue use of the proxy comparison method. 
Changes in the compensation system included a tightening of provisions for 
mental stress and chronic pain."

Unless they can rebut my allegations / affidavit* point by point, with 
another affidavit by someone who has firsthand knowledge, contrary to what I 
have stated my allegations are in good standing and binding (ALL ARE 
SUPPORTED BY HARD EVIDENCE -first hand knowledge). No hearsay.
Now, I am asking Tribunal to execute administrative remedy for default 
judgment. Please make sure that it is sworn under their full commercial 
liability, in an Affidavit. I listed all the criminal charges as you see 
there are many and I backed them up with hard evidence in my submissions / 
Affidavits.
Please get them (whomever is doing me harm) in their private capacity under 
full commercial liability, and not in the public under limited liability. 
ex. The man/woman that can think, and is of sound mind.

Dear Sir, due to a pattern of persistent ,AGGRAVATING / aggressive / 
psychopathic / dangerous behaviour by the offender and perjury showing a 
substantial degree of indifference on the part of the offender respecting 
the reasonably foreseeable consequences to other persons of his behaviour I 
am asking Tribunal (WSIAT) TO INCREASE DEMANDED COMPENSATION FOR ALL I DO 
ALLEGE FROM APOTEX TO ORIGINALLY REQUESTED in Human Rights Commission.
Reportedly Apotex sued Dr. Olivieri for $20.000.000.00 (twenty millions) only because she 
disclosed negative side effects of one of Apotex's products.


Dear Sir, Apotex developed integrated and very successful network of crime 
in Ontario. We do have very many examples of very refined banditry against 
me by Apotex /Counsel Carl Peterson. I was (am) tortured by Apotex / 
Counsel!
Political correctness does not apply if we are dealing with criminal 
activities at such level and on such scale, causing so much harm to so many!

Apotex / Counsel perpetuate culture of crime and violations of Human Rights 
in Ontario (operate as a
coordination centre, predator / violator of human rights). They violate all 
Laws and Legislative and commit crimes against me / Citizens.
Counsel Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) acts as a 
coordinating link amongst Government Agencies committing
crimes against me / Citizens.

Counsel's Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) actions are 
"fatally flawed"! His actions are so unfair to me, that
it was / is simply not possible to logically follow the pathway taken by the 
Counsel. I am greatly suffering from total lawlessness of Apotex's 
/Counsel's actions.
Apotex's criminal acts will be long remembered as its campaign against own 
employees as well as against health consumers.

Counsel Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) is engaged in 
criminal activities on behalf of Criminal
Corporation FOR MANY YEARS AND HE MUST BE STOPPED!

I know /have reason to believe that those individuals are known assisters,
abettors, conspirators, colluders with others in the illicit acts to
torture, discriminate, denie of medical help to me / a disabled person.
It is submitted , that Apotex / Counsel, Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely
Thorup Angeletti LLP) should be prevented from abuse and obstruction of 
WSIAT's adjudicative process and from making
any frivolous, vexatious , trivial , made in bad faith suggestions with out 
any merit / scientific / legal bases further tormenting/ torturing me /a 
victim. He should be charged with Contempt of WSIAT and all
other Administrative Boards, Commissions, Tribunals processes etc.
Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) falsified all 
records provided by him to all Government Agencies
and engaged others / employees in criminal conspiracy (documented) which 
untimely further deteriorated(s) my state of health.
He purposely omits very critical evidence and medical conditions (or is 
reducing them/evidence in to insignificance).
For many years Counsel was committing crimes against me / a victim by 
falsifying/ concealing evidence / Documents, soliciting criminal witnesses 
etc.
Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) got engaged in 
intentional malicious conduct on behalf of Criminal
Corporation -Apotex, violating all statutes with a reckless indifference. He 
acted in the face of a perceived risk that his actions will violate all 
laws, torture and destroy / kill (?) suffering, sick person.
They perpetuated TORTURE, TORMENT, RETRIBUTION, DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT 
and fraud etc.
Mr. Carl Peterson, (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) did knowingly and 
willfully make a materially false, fictitious and fraudulent
statements and representation in a matter within the jurisdiction of the
Ontario Labor Board, WSiB, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Tribunal and 
other Government Agencies, in the process DENIED MEDICAL HELP as well as 
obstructed Canadian Constitution, Legal System etc.
Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) committed many counts 
of perverting the course of justice or intending to
pervert the course of justice, many counts of perjury, criminal conspiracy, 
criminal negligence, criminal recruitment of false witnesses, attempted 
murder, did contribute to my permanent disability, irreparable damage.
Issues and/or events which occurred after my departure from Employer are
also in full are Apotex's (Carl Peterson's -Company's Counsel as
accomplice /executor ) liabilities due to fact that he on behalf of Apotex 
actively sabotaged legal /administrative proceedings in all
Government Agencies in question. Preliminary matters are that Mr. Peterson 
(Company's Counsel) in premeditated manner is
torturing me for MANY, MANY years and pending. He / Company /accomplices act 
without any consideration for the human rights and my well being despite 
their awareness of my situation and familiarity with my File.

Apotex is defiant, not regretful, with out remorse, not willing to correct 
wrong doings.

Mr. Carl Peterson,(Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP - Apotex) falsified or 
concealed all records provided by them to Ontario
Labor Board, WSiB, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Tribunal and other
Government Agencies (collectively Government) and engaged other people in
criminal conspiracy (documented) which untimely further deteriorates my
state of health. On behalf of Company he committed many counts of
perverting the course of justice or intending to pervert the course of
justice, many counts of perjury, criminal conspiracy, criminal negligence,
criminal recruitment of false witnesses, attempted murder, did contribute to
permanent disability, irreparable damage.
Counsel got involved in my Case, purposely was omitting
/altering very critical evidence and medical conditions (or were reducing it
in to insignificance) and were paid for it while limiting my professional
and personal life, making challenging my social life, destroyed my marriage,
imposed extreme hardship on my family and relatives/friends and in vicious /
malicious manner on on going bases is preventing me from enjoying my
Constitutional Right to obtain medical help, be able to provide for myself 
etc.
Due to he's persistent criminal activities I selected to proceed with CIVIL/ 
CRIMINAL/ LEGAL ACTION
AGAINST Mr. Carl Peterson and his Firm (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP).
ADDITIONALLY I am NAMING Apotex's Counsel Carl Peterson and Filion Wakely 
Thorup Angeletti LLP as secondary offender, accomplice, collaborator, 
enabler, torturer and I am imposing on them restitution for all I allege in 
imdicated amount -THIS IS INDEPENDENT FROM APOTEX'S COMPENSATION / 
RESTITUTION.

Due to extreme criminal /psychopathic behavior of Apotex and its Counsel, I 
am petitioning Tribunal to trigger processes declaring Apotex as well as 
separately and independently Apotex's Counsel - Carl Peterson (Filion 
Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) "dangerous offenders"/ "habitual offenders"/ 
terrorists .

This designation must be in force until they prove that they are not a 
danger to me / society.

Law puts the onus on the offender rather than on the Crown which makes it 
easier to designate some repeat offenders as dangerous offenders, which 
effectively can put them behind bars for life.(Apotex / Carl 
Peterson -Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) for 7+ years commit crimes 
against me /General Public - of what I do allege in all Government Agencies 
previously listed).

The dangerous offender provisions can apply to all criminals.

The justice system considers them to be special cases and, consequently, 
treats them differently than the average offender. Regular sentencing is 
considered ineffective for these individuals; they are not deterred by the 
normal punishment, nor are they likely be reformed. These individuals pose a 
serious hazard to the physical and psychological well-being of me and 
society. Compared to the average offender, dangerous offenders have more 
psychopathic traits .

Dangerous offenders tend to target children, and / or the elderly, or the 
disabled like in my case.They pray upon oblivious Society.

The Dangerous Offender provisions of the Criminal Code are intended to 
protect all Canadians from the most dangerous violent /predators in the 
country. Individuals convicted of these offences can be designated as a 
Dangerous Offender during sentencing if it is shown that there is a 
significantly high risk that they will commit future offences. The objective 
of protecting innocent Canadians from future harm can and will ensure in 
such cases that the offender will remain in prison indefinitely until that 
risk no longer exists. If the court finds an offender to be a dangerous 
offender, it shall impose a sentence of detention in a penitentiary for an 
indeterminate period.

The Dangerous Offender designation is targeting "persistent dangerous 
criminals engaged in the more serious forms of crime"-torture, terrorism, 
habitual large scale fraud etc.

The Canadian version went significantly further than its British counterpart 
in that it allowed discretion for the courts to impose either a determinate 
or an indeterminate sentence.
The provisions were amended a number of times, but the next major 
re-drafting occurred in August 1997 with the passage of C-55, and are still 
in place today:
Amended the "dangerous offender" (DO) designation to streamline the 
procedure, making it more efficient;
Created the new designation of "Long Term Offender" and a new "long-term 
supervision order" that begins upon the completion of the custodial sentence 
and can be up to 10 years in length. It provides a complementary option to 
the DO designation and focuses on offenders not captured by the DO 
provisions, but who still present a substantial risk to re-offend;
Enacted section 810.2 recognizance orders for individuals who present a 
danger of committing a "serious personal injury" offence; and changed the 
initial parole review for a DO to seven years from the previous three years, 
and every two years thereafter.
The Dangerous Offender provision is contained in Section 753 of the Criminal 
Code of Canada:
753. (1) The court may, on application made under this Part following the 
filing of an assessment report under subsection 752.1(2), find the offender 
to be a dangerous offender if it is satisfied
that the offence for which the offender has been convicted is a serious 
personal injury offence described in paragraph (a) of the definition of that 
expression in section 752 and the offender constitutes a threat to the life, 
safety or physical or mental well-being of other persons on the basis of 
evidence establishing a pattern of repetitive behavior by the offender, of 
which the offence for which he or she has been convicted forms a part, 
showing a failure to restrain his or her behavior and a likelihood of 
causing death or injury to other persons, or inflicting severe psychological 
damage on other persons, through failure in the future to restrain his or 
her behavior, a pattern of persistent aggressive behaviour by the offender, 
of which the offence for which he or she has been convicted forms a part, 
showing a substantial degree of indifference on the part of the offender 
respecting the reasonably foreseeable consequences to other persons of his 
or her behaviour, or
any behaviour by the offender, associated with the offence for which he or 
she has been convicted, that is of such a brutal nature as to compel the 
conclusion that the offender's behaviour in the future is unlikely to be 
inhibited by normal standards of behavioural restraint; or
that the offence for which the offender has been convicted is a serious 
personal injury offence described in paragraph (b) of the definition of that 
expression in section 752 and the offender, by his or her conduct in any 
matter including that involved in the commission of the offence for which he 
or she has been convicted, has shown a failure to control his or her 
impulses and a likelihood of causing injury, pain or other evil to other 
persons through failure in the future to control his or her impulses.
(4) If the court finds an offender to be a dangerous offender, it shall 
impose a sentence of detention in a penitentiary for an indeterminate 
period.
Under the Dangerous Offender - Long-Term Offender provisions, the Crown may 
initiate an application where the offender is convicted of a "serious 
personal injury offence". This prerequisite is defined as meeting the 
criteria in s.752(a), which requires a finding that the particular offence 
was essentially violent or potentially violent and carries a potential 
maximum sentence of at least 10 years or more.
It is the initial responsibility of the provincial (or, in the territories, 
the federal) Crown prosecutor in each case to make the decision whether or 
not to seek a Dangerous Offender application. If the Crown believes the 
offender justifies such an application, the first step is to apply for a 60 
day psychiatric assessment under s.752.1. Once the report of the assessor is 
returned to the court, the Crown uses the information to determine whether 
the application should proceed. If there is merit, the Crown must gain the 
written approval of the provincial Attorney General or, for applications 
within the territories, the federal Minister of Justice before proceeding 
with the application.
The inquiry by the court focuses on the issue of public protection, and 
whether or not the risk the offender poses to the general public is severe 
enough to merit an indeterminate sentence, with no opportunity for parole 
for seven years. It is the toughest sentence available under the Criminal 
Code.

MINISTER OF JUSTICE PROPOSES STRINGENT NEW RULES TO PROTECT CANADIANS FROM 
DANGEROUS AND HIGH-RISK OFFENDERS:
OTTAWA, October 17, 2006 - Minister of Justice and Attorney General of 
Canada, the Honourable Vic Toews, Q.C., today introduced legislation that 
will allow for more effective sentencing and management of violent 
offenders, as part of the Government of Canada's commitment to tackle crime.
"Canadian families expect protection from dangerous and high-risk 
offenders," said Minister Toews." Canada's New Government is delivering that 
protection. We are moving ahead with aggressive changes to ensure that our 
streets and communities are safe."
"There is nothing more he artbreaking than when a criminal who is known to 
be dangerous gets further opportunities to hurt someone," said the 
Honourable Stockwell Day, Minister of Public Safety . "It is time to 
implement effective preventative measures to safeguard communities and 
children from individuals identified as dangerous or high-risk offenders, 
and at the same time, to strengthen the ability of law enforcement agencies 
to deal with these individuals. This government is serious about getting 
tough on crime," he added.
The proposed reforms target Criminal Code provisions governing Dangerous 
Offenders, to make it easier for Crown prosecutors to obtain Dangerous 
Offender designations. Such designations reflect the most severe sentence 
available in Canadian law.
The reforms would also strengthen section 810.1 and 810.2 Peace Bond 
provisions to allow for longer and more aggressive supervision after 
designated offenders are released back into communities. These reforms will 
target violent predators and allow judges to extend the terms of such 
orders, as well as clarify that strict supervisory, monitoring and residency 
conditions can be imposed to protect Canadians from these individuals.
"Many of these changes have been specifically requested by provinces and 
territories," added Minister Toews. "This legislation will ensure that 
high-risk and dangerous offenders face tougher consequences when they are 
sentenced, and are kept better track of when they are released into the 
community. "
Along with these legislative reforms, all jurisdictions are committed to 
working collaboratively to improve other essential program measures under 
the federal leadership of the Minister of Public Safety.
Dangerous Offender Definition:
A person convicted of serious crimes and who is likely to re-offend
"The court may ... find the offender to be a dangerous offender if it is 
satisfied
that the offence for which the offender has been convicted is a serious 
personal injury offence ... and the offender constitutes a threat to the 
life, safety or physical or mental well-being of other persons on the basis 
of evidence establishing
a pattern of repetitive behaviour by the offender, of which the offence for 
which he or she has been convicted forms a part, showing a failure to 
restrain his or her behaviour and a likelihood of causing death or injury to 
other persons, or inflicting severe psychological damage on other persons, 
through failure in the future to restrain his or her behaviour,
a pattern of persistent aggressive behaviour by the offender, of which the 
offence for which he or she has been convicted forms a part, showing a 
substantial degree of indifference on the part of the offender respecting 
the reasonably foreseeable consequences to other persons of his or her 
behaviour, or
any behaviour by the offender, associated with the offence for which he or 
she has been convicted, that is of such a brutal nature as to compel the 
conclusion that the offender's behaviour in the future is unlikely to be 
inhibited by normal standards of behavioural restraint; or
that the offence for which the offender has been convicted is a serious 
personal injury offence ... and the offender, by his or her conduct in any 
sexual matter including that involved in the commission of the offence for 
which he or she has been convicted, has shown a failure to control his or 
her impulses and a likelihood of causing injury, pain or other evil to 
other persons through failure in the future to control his or her sexual 
impulses.
In a FAQs available in 2007, Public Safety Canada (see publicsafety.gc.ca) 
summarized the dangerous offender designation as follows:
"A dangerous offender designation results from an application by the 
provincial Crown Prosecutor to identify offenders that if released after a 
normal sentence would pose a significant danger to the public. If granted, 
the designation carries an automatic indeterminate sentence with no chance 
of parole for seven years. Offences that meet the dangerous offender 
criteria are defined in the Criminal Code as serious personal injury 
offences, including specific sexual assault offences or, alternatively, a 
particular offence that was essentially violent or potentially violent and 
carries a potential maximum sentence of at least 10 years or more."

The results showed the Dangerous Offender provisions of the Criminal Code of 
Canada are being applied to offenders who likely pose a significant risk to 
the public.
The application of the Dangerous Offender provisions point to a need to 
target all violent offenders.
Bill BILL C-27: An Act to amend the Criminal Code
(dangerous offenders and recognizance to keep the peace)*
R.S. 1985, c. C-46.
Section 752 of the Code defines the term as follows:
"Serious personal injury offence" means
an indictable offence, other than high treason, treason, first degree murder 
or second degree murder, involving
(i) the use or attempted use of violence against another person, or
(ii) conduct endangering or likely to endanger the life or safety of another 
person or inflicting or likely to inflict severe psychological damage on 
another person,
and for which the offender may be sentenced to imprisonment for ten years or 
more etc.
Also REFER
to Bill C-27 provisions..............:)

Apotex committed gross acts of torture, discrimination , retribution, 
harassment , denial of Constitutional and Law protection , denial of medical 
help , criminal conspiracy and all of what I allege in my previous 
submissions /communications during seven + years after criminal termination 
(and pending ) of a very sick , impaired, disabled employee suffering from 
multitude of life threatening medical conditions due to Company's criminal 
negligence. Apotex subjected me to the most horrifying experiences 
imaginable mirroring every depiction of hell! The suffering is unimaginable!
I do suffer horrendously on daily bases (24/7). The symptoms redefine the 
term nightmare. Apotex (my former employer) ravaged me (my system) and my 
family -secondary contaminations!

Apotex falsified all records provided by them to Ontario Labor Board, WSiB,
Ontario Human Rights Commission, Tribunal and other Government Agencies
(collectively Government) and engaged its employees in criminal conspiracy
(documented) which untimely further deteriorates my state of health.
Apotex denied me medical help, Constitutional and Law protection, deprived
mi of ability to get new job and/or provide for my self.

I SUBSTANTIATED WITH HARD EVIDENCE / VERIFIED DOCUMENTS / MY WITNESSES 
STATEMENTS LEGALY CERTIFIED, WITH CONCLUSIONS OF INVESTIGATION BY WORKER 
ADVISER REPRESENTATIVE (one + year investigation), with SUPPORTING 
conclusions of WORKER ADVISER MANAGER's (ADDITIONAL TWO YEARS OF 
INVESTIGATION) , WITH CONFORMATION OF MY ALLEGATIONS BY WSiB's INVESTIGATOR, 
WITH CONFORMATION OF ALL MY ALLEGATIONS BY ONTARIO HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL 
WHICH CONVENIENTLY DISMISSED MY APPLICATION / CASE BECAUSE IT IS STILL 
PENDING WITH WSIAT which has also the power to address HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES 
etc., etc.
THIS IS abuse and obstruction of ALL adjudicative processes and frivolous, 
vexatious , trivial , made in bad faith , with out any merit / scientific / 
legal bases Apotex's action further tormenting/ torturing me /a victim.

The medical evidence is complete to date, but my conditions do deteriorate 
continuously!
This is pending process due to continuous criminal acts by Apotex its 
Counsel and accomplices!

Apotex's Counsel, Mr Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) are 
in contempt and do officially practice Nazism / Apartheid ideology against 
me in Ontario / Canada!
They trumpet in to the mud Ontario's /Canada's democracy, Justice and 
tempers with democratic / constitutional rights of CITIZENS!!
With victory of those entities / individuals fascism, Ontario's / Canada's 
Labour Force / Economy will be subdued by Global Markets.

Apotex unlashed high on drugs / actives Taliban orientation employees (93% 
of employees) anger / frustration and channeled it against me by 
premeditated action of retribution and terror (I was physically and verbally 
attacked many times at work / in Facility). Taliban did cause my right hand 
severe injury and time off work in 2001. Apotex did not report this to WSiB.
Due to stimulated by Apotex daily frictions amongst ethnic groups of 
employees (to keep them week, not questioning atrocious conditions, 
horrifying medical side effect and every thing what I do allege ) I did send 
to Director of HR a note pointing out severity of the situation and need to 
rectify it.
FOR ME ( in Canadian reality), THEY / OPERATORS / TALIBAN (fanatical on 
religion) WERE SIMPLY VERY MUCH SUFFERING CO- WORKERS (DUE TO COMPANY'S 
CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE). FOR ME TALIBAN EMPLOYEES WERE HUMAN BEINGS ACTING 
UNDER ADVERSE PRODUCTS SIDE EFFECTS - displayed horrifying medical problems 
/injuries. That is why I started to supply on my own First Aid materials to 
all in need on my shift. I did this for very long period of time.

All evidence shows that the Corporation and its Counsel deviated from the 
standard of
behavior and that personal injury , torture and every thing what I do allege 
could have been prevented and that the
deviation resulted in my personal injury.
Apotex's (employer's) conduct at the time of my termination (business 
reasons -I displayed horrifying medical problems / injuries) was conducted 
in bad faith, dishonestly, in a manner that caused public embarrassment, was
callous, shocking, in blatant disregard of my (employee's) dignity and
well-being. It was done with an evil heart and purpose; malicious; wicked;
villainous, lawless, felonious, corrupt, crooked, culpable, deplorable,
dirty, heavy, illegal, illicit, immoral, indictable, iniquitous, nefarious,
off base, out of line, scandalous, shady, unlawful, unrighteous, vicious,
villainous, wicked, wrong.
It was out right criminal!
I was most vulnerable / very sick and hence, most in need of protection
(both economic and personal).
It was/is a traumatic event for me. Termination was accompanied by acts of
bad faith in the manner of discharge and the results were/are especially
devastating.
I believe that in the course of dismissal employers ought to be candid,
reasonable, honest and forthright with their employees and should refrain
from engaging in conduct that is unfair or in bad faith by being for
example, untruthful, misleading or unduly insensitive.
Apotex tortured me during my employment and does it for 7 years after
termination (pending). Apotex deprived me of all medical, economical and all
other help / means.
AND THAT WAS / IS DONE IN ONTARIO / CANADA !

COUNSEL CARL PETERSON DOES "PROCESS" ME IN CRIMINAL MANNER AND CAUSE 
DETERIORATION OF MY EXISTING INJURIES / MEDICAL CONDITIONS, DEVELOPMENT OF 
NEW A SPECIALLY PSYCHOLOGICAL AND MUST BE CHARGED EQUALLY WITH MY EX- 
NEGLIGENT EMPLOYER. Savings and Restructuring Act introduced Amendments to 
the Employment
Standards Act (ESA) clarifying or strengthening the rights of WORKERS.
The Act stipulated to discontinue use of the proxy comparison method. 
Changes in the compensation system included a tightening of provisions for 
mental stress and chronic pain.

Regards,

(Apotex's / WSiB's / Counsel's, Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup 
Angeletti LLP) / Government's of Ontario victim)