Apotex - contamination     www.apotexholocaust.com            www.pharmaholocaust.com
I live like a walking death in twilight zone / some where in between death and a life being deprived of all Human Rights and Constitutional / Law 
protection by habitual offenders. I was assessed by three (3) independent psychiatrists to eliminate offender's speculations about my insanity 
prompting "delusions" etc. All psychiatrists stated clearly, that I am sane /I do NOT have/had any mental illness. No family history of any.
ACCESSORY / ACCOMPLICE TO CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
Apotex - Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario

Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario
Nov. 18/2009
Dear Madam,

It is submitted , that in the Letter dated Nov 17 / 2009 Apotex / Counsel 
ignores all evidence / submissions and in its criminally twisted methodology 
attempts to reiterate fabricated information and alter Tribunal's 
/Commission's Judicial Process.
It is submitted, that Release Document was extorted.
. Forwarded by Counsel / Apotex request that this Application be dismissed 
on alleged preliminary bases is outrageous.
. In accordance with Human Rights Code no one ever can sign away ones own 
HUMAN RIGHTS on any circumstance (any conditions )-period. ( )
. Release Document Apotex invalidated by its own actions (it is not binding 
/ legal due to reasons listed in previous communications).
. IT IS EXTREMELLY IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT IN APENDIX " A " IN APOTEX'S 
RESPONSE TO MY APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 50 OF THE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND 
SAFETY ACT BEFORE THE ONTARIO LABOUR RELATIONS BOARD (AS WELL AS BEFORE 
WSiB, HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, TRIBUNAL AND OTHER GOVERNAMENT AGENCIES) 
APOTEX /COUNSEL INCLUDES IN POINT 1 OF THE RESPOND "APOTEX / EMPLOYER DENIES 
EACH AND EVERY ALLEGATION ("OUTRAGEOUS ALLEGATIONS") OF MISCONDUCT CONTAINED 
IN THE COMPLAINT AND PUTS THE COMPLEINANT TO THE STRICT PROOF THEREOF. THE 
EMPLOYER ALSO SUBMITS THAT THE COMPLEINT IS COMPLETELY WITH OUT MERIT AND 
OUT TO BE DISMISSED WITH OUT A HEARING FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS."
. IT IS SUBMITED THAT APOTEX'S CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR IS EXTREME SO FORTH IT IS 
EXTREMELY IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT AFTER SO MANY YEARS OF RETRIBUTION, 
DISCRIMINATION, HERRASEMENT, DENAIL OF MEDICAL HELP APOTEX /COUNSEL ADMITS 
ALL MY ALLEGATIONS (RESPONSE ON ALLEGED PRELIMINARY ISSUES, PAGE 3, OCT 
22/2009 UNDER "JURISDICTION" ( ), BUT THIS TIME AROUND CLAIMING THAT THE 
ALLEGATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS CODE.
. TROUGH OUT ALMOST 6 YEARS IN ALL RESPONSES TO ALL GOVERNAMENT AGENCIES 
APOTEX / COUNSEL CLAIMED THAT PARTICULAR ALLEGATIONS ARE NOT VIOLATIONS OF 
PARTICULAR AGENCY'S REGULATIONS.
. BASED ON HRONOLOGY OF EVENTS AND THE CONTENT OF APOTEX'S STATEMENTS ONE 
CAN CONCLUDE THAT IF MY CASE WOULD GO TO SUPREME COURT OR PUBLIC'S INQUIRY, 
FBI etc., THEN APOTEX WOULD STATE THAT IN FACT I WAS HERRASED, 
DISCRIMINATED, SUBJECTED TO RETRIBUTION etc. BUT THESE FACTS/ ACTS ARE NOT 
JURISDICTOION / MANDATE OF THOSE INSTITUTIONS.
. DUE TO APOTEX'S TORTURE, RETRIBUTION, DISCRIMINATION, HERRASEMENT DURRING 
MY EMPLOYMENT AND AFTER AND DENAIL OF MEDICAL HELP I SUSTAINED INJURIES AT 
WORK AND PERMANENT DISABILITIES SUFFERING A GREAT DEAL!
SIGNED RELEASE
- MY SIGNATURE UNDER "Release Document" was obtained as result of 
intimidation, pressure and by other not legal tactics / means (psychological 
/ financial duress - both of my parents died few weeks earlier after they 
learned about my medical conditions as well as I was incapacitated /very 
sick).
- Apotex DRUGGED me up and DECEIVED.
I was under influence of psychiatric / antidepressants and narcotics at the 
time of occurrence and after with severely compromised speech mechanism and 
other neurological problems.
- I was coerced / fooled in to signing a Termination Agreement.
- Apotex subjected me to disabling and deadly withdrawal effects associated 
with products.
- Company abused my condition and committed crime against me.
- I was profoundly sick at the time of occurrence and after.
- I did not understand the terms and conditions of the Release Document.
- Apotex heavily incapacitated me and as result of it I was not in position 
to obtain any independent legal advice. (Apotex sabotaged all my attempts to 
obtain any legal advice/ support - documented).
- Based on chronology, nature of events and the content of the Release 
Document it is easy to conclude Apotex's motive.
It is submitted , that Record of Employment was not presented to me at the 
time of criminal act of Termination but three (3 ) weeks after (it was 
mailed to me). The letter "M" on it was pointed out by Apotex's Office Clerk 
processing my RRSP contributions and consequently discovered by my friends / 
family. I was still heavily incapacitated at that time.
The Release was every thing but just / fair as Respondent cleims. The 
"reasonable "severance was even not compliant with Employment Standards Act 
(completely without consideration for human rights breach).
In original Section 50 Occupational Health and Safety Application I was told 
by Labour Board what I should indicate in it.
As events proved, Board acted under Apotex/ Counsel's criminal influence.
It is submitted, that such terminology (intimidation, duress etc.) was as 
well mentioned (defined ) in WSiB's Application / Investigation. This time 
around it was not purged from my File.
The letter "M" on Record of Employment WAS ONE OF MANY FACTORS WHICH 
ADDITIONALLY INVALIDATED ALREADY INVALID / CRIMINAL RELEASE DOCUMENT. 
DECEIVE / ABANDONMENT WAS THE NEXT OF MANY FACTORS INDICATEING CRIMINAL 
MOTIVES AND BEHAVIOURS ON BEHALF OF APOTEX.
While incapacitated and very sick I signed a typical, broadly-worded 
release - the kind that attempts to bar any future actions from being 
brought, including complaints not yet filed or even contemplated. The 
Commission has approved at its meeting in March of 2006, and now published 
its Guide to Releases in Human Rights Complaints. This comprehensive guide 
should be guidance in assessing Apotex's bad faith.
If I failed to indicate / quote any particular term (intimidated etc.) that 
does not mean that such term does not apply.
It does mean that I could not list all terms from the vocabulary / 
dictionary which do apply in to my circumstance due to adversary actions on 
behalf of Apotex and due to my medical condition.
It is submitted , that Apotex / Counsel should refrain from making any 
frivolous, vexatious , trivial , made in bad faith suggestions such as " if 
the Applicant was intimidated , drugged, deceived into signing a Release it 
would have been front and centre in his Section 50 Application and the 
original Human Rights Complaint". (bottom of the front page and top of the 
second page in the Letter dated Nov 17 / 2009).
It submitted, that respondent's submissions concerning my Application 
contain ad hoc rationalizations to avoid finding out, that its activities 
are criminal and Respondent should be declared as the one committing crimes 
against humanity, committing acts of domestic and Global terrorism and 
should be investigated by Amnesty International, FBI, Ministry of Public 
Safety and trialed by Tribunal in Strasburg for such crimes. ( 554 Lots 
rejected in two years! No record where that stuff went! WHY? SOLD?!!!!!!!!
IN ONTARIO PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY IS COMMITTING CRIMES AGAINST 
HUMANITY!!!!!)
Respondent should be declared an enemy within/ Publics enemy.
I believe that appropriate actions will be taken be Commission and a 
Tribunal.
It is submitted, that under pressure of such serious allegations (admited by 
Company's Manager, witnesses and Respondent/ Counsel)Respondent will argue, 
that "a day is a night" and will invent its own definitions of terms to suit 
its own purpose as it did trough out legal processing of Dr. Olivieri's Case 
(we have many examples documented by Authorities). Trivialized by Counsel 
"his own wording" was a recollection of facts by sick/ disabled/ suffering 
person couched by Government Agencies.
Extreme Delay
All my actions do constitute "good faith".
It is submitted that there was not any delay (extreme?!) at all.
- I did not have any one knowledge in administrating of my Case and 
represent me ( no Union and I am profoundly sick / disable)'
- I was under influence / heavily impaired on psychiatric / antidepressants, 
narcotics and other potent medications before, during and after occurrence. 
Company in acts of retribution and criminal negligence exposed me to highly 
potent / dangerous toxic substances for 6.5 years period with out any 
Personal Protection Equipment.
- I was profoundly sick at the time of occurrence and after (I could not 
talk, hold a pan, walk, rationalize what was happening.
- Company abused my condition and committed crimes against me.
- Company deceived me with promises of a new job with out exposure to toxic 
substances at the time of occurrence and after.
- Apotex repeatedly stagnated and dragged in time (discovery process") my 
Case. I was misguided in the process.
It is submitted that I did not failed to provide any evidence for a 
rationale of my argument ? I did forward many submissions after my 
Application in regard to Section 50 ,that is why my Application was 
processed successfully to the point of mediation and Registrar's processing.
It was dismissed after one year of processing / delay tactics under Apotex's 
criminal conspiracy.
It is submitted, that despite Counsel's criminal definition of "prima Facie 
Case" my Case meets all criteria of Human Rights Code which originated from 
(amongst other factors) expressed in open manner (internally) my concerns in 
area of Health and Safety, conflict of interest as well product quality 
issues.
NO TIME LIMITATION ON HUMAN RIGHTS CASES
"The following is the text of the package of motions to amend Bill 107 which 
the Conservative Party presented to the Standing Committee on Justice Policy 
on November 29, 2006.
mot107pc.e
Motions package draft 5
Bill 107
An Act to amend the Human Rights Code
Motion to be moved in Committee
M
Section 6 of the Bill (clause 34 (2) (a) of the Human Rights Code)
I move that clause 34 (2) (a) of the Human Rights Code, as set out in 
section 6 of the Bill, be struck out."
JURISDICTION -PRIMA FACIE CASE
All acts / facts do constitute a violation of the Human Rights Code.
I produced many particulars and statements which clearly established a Claim 
of discrimination on the bases of age, disability, ethnic origin, place of 
origin, reprisal and harassment.
I was terminated because of raised safety/ conflict of interest, product 
quality issues which prompted constant harassment, retaliation as well as 
discrimination (one of the tools Apotex utilized to deal with me / 
associated issues).
My Complaint pursuant to Section 50 of the Occupational Health and Safety 
Act against Respondent in 2006 was filled under guidance of Ontario Human 
Rights Commission and was selected / initiated by Ontario Labour Board.
I was very sick and impaired and I relied on Government Agencies to select 
the proper avenue to proceed with my concerns / claims/ allegations.
To submit by Counsel motion to dismiss my Application with out a hearing on 
the basis that it does not constitute a prima facie case of a violation of 
the Human Rights Code and constitutes an abuse of the Commission's / 
Tribunal's process is yet again demonstrating acts of discrimination, 
harassment and retribution.
Again, the reason why I did not file a complain with the Human Rights 
Commission back in 2004-or - 2005 is not because of the substance of my 
Complaint included sole issues of health and safety and quality of the 
product but because I WAS SICK, IMPAIRED UNDER INFLUENCE AS RESULT OF 
ADVERSE SIDE EFFECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC/ ANTIDEPRESSANT AND NARCOTICS and I 
relied on guidance of the Commission and other Government Agencies.
I was guided by Ontario Human Rights Commission right from the beginning and 
Commission send me to Labour Board where format of my Application was 
amended number of times.
Essentially Apotex's Counsel is imposing on the Tribunal opinion whether or 
not the substance of my Application is within the jurisdiction of this 
Tribunal.
Apotex / Counsel are trying to define Tribunal's jurisdiction and 
competence.
Apotex appears to believe that it can simply disregard Canadian 
Constitution, Law, and all Legislatives and manipulate in to own advantage 
all Government Agencies if that will assist it in adversarial tactics 
against Citizens. Canadian citizens can have little legal protection from 
major corporate interests if a corporation such as Apotex can so readily 
oppress an individual.
Company got engaged in intentional malicious conduct violating all statutes 
with a reckless indifference. It acted in the face of a perceived risk that 
its actions will violate all laws.
DUE TO RETRIBUTION, DISCRIMINATION (AGE, PLACE OF ORIGIN), HERRASMENT 
(EXPRESSED CONCERNS IN AREA OF HEALTH AND SAFETY, PRODUCT CONTAMINATION 
etc.) Apotex did knowingly and willfully make a materially false, fictitious 
and fraudulent statements and representation in a matter within the 
jurisdiction of the Ontario Labor Board, WSiB, Ontario Human Rights 
Commission, Tribunal and other Government Agencies, DENIED MEDICAL HELP as 
well obstructed Canadian Constitution etc.
Apotex committed many counts of perverting the course of justice or 
intending to pervert the course of justice, many counts of perjury, criminal 
conspiracy, criminal negligence, criminal recruitment of false witnesses, 
attempted murder, did cause permanent disability, irreparable damage. Issues 
and/or events which occurred after my departure from Employer are also in 
full are Apotex's liabilities due to fact that Apotex actively sabotaged 
legal /administrative proceedings in all Government Agencies in question. 
Preliminary matters are that Apotex In premeditated manner is torturing me 
for MANY, MANY years and pending. Company acts without any consideration for 
the human rights.
Apotex falsified all records provided by them to Ontario Labor Board, WSiB, 
Ontario Human Rights Commission, Tribunal and other Government Agencies 
(collectively Government) and engaged its employees in criminal conspiracy 
(documented) which untimely further deteriorates my state of health.
Many individuals involved in my Case purposely are omitting very critical 
evidence and medical conditions (or are reducing it in to insignificance).
Please focus on 7 years of my unprotected work with toxic / controlled 
substances/narcotics , which are known to cause my conditions even in 
dosages regularly prescribed by Doctors and much more/worse if over dosed.
Please start to question harmful molecules which Company processed not 
reviling nature /name of them and keeping in confidentiality Work Orders and 
Safety Data Sheets as well not providing any protection for employees.
Apotex committed many counts of perverting the course of justice or 
intending to pervert the course of justice, many counts of perjury, criminal 
conspiracy, criminal negligence, criminal recruitment of false witnesses, 
attempted murder, did cause permanent disability, irreparable damage.
Company terrorized by many means any one / other employees voicing concerns 
about issues with Safety and quality of the products.
CIVIL LIABILITY does ARISE FROM BAD FAITH.
The matter is the one that falls under federal jurisdiction under the 
Constitution Act, 1867?
Respondent's inconvenience in finding or locating own witnesses or documents 
does not constitute "substantial prejudice, nor does a "simple time delay".
Documents / NOTES can not be lost / misplaced or "not maintained" in the 
pharmaceutical Company / Industry unless you do not generate any or 
purposely lose them. What about "good documentation practices"?
Policy mandatory in the Industry? Oh, right, Apotex has the Policy only for 
Authorities and to use it as a tool for propaganda.
Well, contrarily to Apotex I did observe the Policy in order to assist my 
ex- employer in achieving its vision / goals. Unfortunately, despite fact, 
that I utilized the Policy of "Good Documentation Practices" in good faith / 
into Company's benefit, the Company punished me for it.
Company was #1 only because no one was checking any thing. No mechanisms in 
force to control SELF REGULATING PHARMACY!
For years sick people are turning 6' under the ground due to contaminated 
medications!

Best Regards,
Apotex's victim

PC: 

Ron McArthur - Apotex’s Senior Vice President

During news media interview (2002 ) Apotex’s Senior Vice President , Operations Ron McArthur offered a very liberal description / assessment of internal situation / non compliance as a Standard Operational Procedure ( SOP ) WITH IN THIS Organization ( Apotex ) which by its nature invalidated all Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). All ingredients (actives, controlled substances and every thing else together on the floors in manufacturing (MFG) / Packaging (PKG) areas / all over.
Apotex for years sacrificed own employees AND FOR MANY YEARS very negatively impacted unfortunate, afflicted, and very much suffering vulnerable people / health products consumers.
Scores of them were pushed over the edge by contamination, over dose (luck of actives) etc.
Justice was not served for those affected those who perished in agony / their families / General Public (somebody’s loved ones) often spending last pennies on meds which suppose to help.
Construction / expansion created mayhem for 6 + years.
Ron McArthur actually provided some real matrix / matrices.