Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario
It is submitted , that in the Letter dated Nov 17 / 2009 Apotex / Counsel
ignores all evidence / submissions and in its criminally twisted methodology
attempts to reiterate fabricated information and alter Tribunal's
/Commission's Judicial Process.
It is submitted, that Release Document was extorted.
. Forwarded by Counsel / Apotex request that this Application be dismissed
on alleged preliminary bases is outrageous.
. In accordance with Human Rights Code no one ever can sign away ones own
HUMAN RIGHTS on any circumstance (any conditions )-period. ( )
. Release Document Apotex invalidated by its own actions (it is not binding
/ legal due to reasons listed in previous communications).
. IT IS EXTREMELLY IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT IN APENDIX " A " IN APOTEX'S
RESPONSE TO MY APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 50 OF THE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND
SAFETY ACT BEFORE THE ONTARIO LABOUR RELATIONS BOARD (AS WELL AS BEFORE
WSiB, HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, TRIBUNAL AND OTHER GOVERNAMENT AGENCIES)
APOTEX /COUNSEL INCLUDES IN POINT 1 OF THE RESPOND "APOTEX / EMPLOYER DENIES
EACH AND EVERY ALLEGATION ("OUTRAGEOUS ALLEGATIONS") OF MISCONDUCT CONTAINED
IN THE COMPLAINT AND PUTS THE COMPLEINANT TO THE STRICT PROOF THEREOF. THE
EMPLOYER ALSO SUBMITS THAT THE COMPLEINT IS COMPLETELY WITH OUT MERIT AND
OUT TO BE DISMISSED WITH OUT A HEARING FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS."
. IT IS SUBMITED THAT APOTEX'S CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR IS EXTREME SO FORTH IT IS
EXTREMELY IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT AFTER SO MANY YEARS OF RETRIBUTION,
DISCRIMINATION, HERRASEMENT, DENAIL OF MEDICAL HELP APOTEX /COUNSEL ADMITS
ALL MY ALLEGATIONS (RESPONSE ON ALLEGED PRELIMINARY ISSUES, PAGE 3, OCT
22/2009 UNDER "JURISDICTION" ( ), BUT THIS TIME AROUND CLAIMING THAT THE
ALLEGATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS CODE.
. TROUGH OUT ALMOST 6 YEARS IN ALL RESPONSES TO ALL GOVERNAMENT AGENCIES
APOTEX / COUNSEL CLAIMED THAT PARTICULAR ALLEGATIONS ARE NOT VIOLATIONS OF
PARTICULAR AGENCY'S REGULATIONS.
. BASED ON HRONOLOGY OF EVENTS AND THE CONTENT OF APOTEX'S STATEMENTS ONE
CAN CONCLUDE THAT IF MY CASE WOULD GO TO SUPREME COURT OR PUBLIC'S INQUIRY,
FBI etc., THEN APOTEX WOULD STATE THAT IN FACT I WAS HERRASED,
DISCRIMINATED, SUBJECTED TO RETRIBUTION etc. BUT THESE FACTS/ ACTS ARE NOT
JURISDICTOION / MANDATE OF THOSE INSTITUTIONS.
. DUE TO APOTEX'S TORTURE, RETRIBUTION, DISCRIMINATION, HERRASEMENT DURRING
MY EMPLOYMENT AND AFTER AND DENAIL OF MEDICAL HELP I SUSTAINED INJURIES AT
WORK AND PERMANENT DISABILITIES SUFFERING A GREAT DEAL!
- MY SIGNATURE UNDER "Release Document" was obtained as result of
intimidation, pressure and by other not legal tactics / means (psychological
/ financial duress - both of my parents died few weeks earlier after they
learned about my medical conditions as well as I was incapacitated /very
- Apotex DRUGGED me up and DECEIVED.
I was under influence of psychiatric / antidepressants and narcotics at the
time of occurrence and after with severely compromised speech mechanism and
other neurological problems.
- I was coerced / fooled in to signing a Termination Agreement.
- Apotex subjected me to disabling and deadly withdrawal effects associated
- Company abused my condition and committed crime against me.
- I was profoundly sick at the time of occurrence and after.
- I did not understand the terms and conditions of the Release Document.
- Apotex heavily incapacitated me and as result of it I was not in position
to obtain any independent legal advice. (Apotex sabotaged all my attempts to
obtain any legal advice/ support - documented).
- Based on chronology, nature of events and the content of the Release
Document it is easy to conclude Apotex's motive.
It is submitted , that Record of Employment was not presented to me at the
time of criminal act of Termination but three (3 ) weeks after (it was
mailed to me). The letter "M" on it was pointed out by Apotex's Office Clerk
processing my RRSP contributions and consequently discovered by my friends /
family. I was still heavily incapacitated at that time.
The Release was every thing but just / fair as Respondent cleims. The
"reasonable "severance was even not compliant with Employment Standards Act
(completely without consideration for human rights breach).
In original Section 50 Occupational Health and Safety Application I was told
by Labour Board what I should indicate in it.
As events proved, Board acted under Apotex/ Counsel's criminal influence.
It is submitted, that such terminology (intimidation, duress etc.) was as
well mentioned (defined ) in WSiB's Application / Investigation. This time
around it was not purged from my File.
The letter "M" on Record of Employment WAS ONE OF MANY FACTORS WHICH
ADDITIONALLY INVALIDATED ALREADY INVALID / CRIMINAL RELEASE DOCUMENT.
DECEIVE / ABANDONMENT WAS THE NEXT OF MANY FACTORS INDICATEING CRIMINAL
MOTIVES AND BEHAVIOURS ON BEHALF OF APOTEX.
While incapacitated and very sick I signed a typical, broadly-worded
release - the kind that attempts to bar any future actions from being
brought, including complaints not yet filed or even contemplated. The
Commission has approved at its meeting in March of 2006, and now published
its Guide to Releases in Human Rights Complaints. This comprehensive guide
should be guidance in assessing Apotex's bad faith.
If I failed to indicate / quote any particular term (intimidated etc.) that
does not mean that such term does not apply.
It does mean that I could not list all terms from the vocabulary /
dictionary which do apply in to my circumstance due to adversary actions on
behalf of Apotex and due to my medical condition.
It is submitted , that Apotex / Counsel should refrain from making any
frivolous, vexatious , trivial , made in bad faith suggestions such as " if
the Applicant was intimidated , drugged, deceived into signing a Release it
would have been front and centre in his Section 50 Application and the
original Human Rights Complaint". (bottom of the front page and top of the
second page in the Letter dated Nov 17 / 2009).
It submitted, that respondent's submissions concerning my Application
contain ad hoc rationalizations to avoid finding out, that its activities
are criminal and Respondent should be declared as the one committing crimes
against humanity, committing acts of domestic and Global terrorism and
should be investigated by Amnesty International, FBI, Ministry of Public
Safety and trialed by Tribunal in Strasburg for such crimes. ( 554 Lots
rejected in two years! No record where that stuff went! WHY? SOLD?!!!!!!!!
IN ONTARIO PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY IS COMMITTING CRIMES AGAINST
Respondent should be declared an enemy within/ Publics enemy.
I believe that appropriate actions will be taken be Commission and a
It is submitted, that under pressure of such serious allegations (admited by
Company's Manager, witnesses and Respondent/ Counsel)Respondent will argue,
that "a day is a night" and will invent its own definitions of terms to suit
its own purpose as it did trough out legal processing of Dr. Olivieri's Case
(we have many examples documented by Authorities). Trivialized by Counsel
"his own wording" was a recollection of facts by sick/ disabled/ suffering
person couched by Government Agencies.
All my actions do constitute "good faith".
It is submitted that there was not any delay (extreme?!) at all.
- I did not have any one knowledge in administrating of my Case and
represent me ( no Union and I am profoundly sick / disable)'
- I was under influence / heavily impaired on psychiatric / antidepressants,
narcotics and other potent medications before, during and after occurrence.
Company in acts of retribution and criminal negligence exposed me to highly
potent / dangerous toxic substances for 6.5 years period with out any
Personal Protection Equipment.
- I was profoundly sick at the time of occurrence and after (I could not
talk, hold a pan, walk, rationalize what was happening.
- Company abused my condition and committed crimes against me.
- Company deceived me with promises of a new job with out exposure to toxic
substances at the time of occurrence and after.
- Apotex repeatedly stagnated and dragged in time (discovery process") my
Case. I was misguided in the process.
It is submitted that I did not failed to provide any evidence for a
rationale of my argument ? I did forward many submissions after my
Application in regard to Section 50 ,that is why my Application was
processed successfully to the point of mediation and Registrar's processing.
It was dismissed after one year of processing / delay tactics under Apotex's
It is submitted, that despite Counsel's criminal definition of "prima Facie
Case" my Case meets all criteria of Human Rights Code which originated from
(amongst other factors) expressed in open manner (internally) my concerns in
area of Health and Safety, conflict of interest as well product quality
NO TIME LIMITATION ON HUMAN RIGHTS CASES
"The following is the text of the package of motions to amend Bill 107 which
the Conservative Party presented to the Standing Committee on Justice Policy
on November 29, 2006.
Motions package draft 5
An Act to amend the Human Rights Code
Motion to be moved in Committee
Section 6 of the Bill (clause 34 (2) (a) of the Human Rights Code)
I move that clause 34 (2) (a) of the Human Rights Code, as set out in
section 6 of the Bill, be struck out."
JURISDICTION -PRIMA FACIE CASE
All acts / facts do constitute a violation of the Human Rights Code.
I produced many particulars and statements which clearly established a Claim
of discrimination on the bases of age, disability, ethnic origin, place of
origin, reprisal and harassment.
I was terminated because of raised safety/ conflict of interest, product
quality issues which prompted constant harassment, retaliation as well as
discrimination (one of the tools Apotex utilized to deal with me /
My Complaint pursuant to Section 50 of the Occupational Health and Safety
Act against Respondent in 2006 was filled under guidance of Ontario Human
Rights Commission and was selected / initiated by Ontario Labour Board.
I was very sick and impaired and I relied on Government Agencies to select
the proper avenue to proceed with my concerns / claims/ allegations.
To submit by Counsel motion to dismiss my Application with out a hearing on
the basis that it does not constitute a prima facie case of a violation of
the Human Rights Code and constitutes an abuse of the Commission's /
Tribunal's process is yet again demonstrating acts of discrimination,
harassment and retribution.
Again, the reason why I did not file a complain with the Human Rights
Commission back in 2004-or - 2005 is not because of the substance of my
Complaint included sole issues of health and safety and quality of the
product but because I WAS SICK, IMPAIRED UNDER INFLUENCE AS RESULT OF
ADVERSE SIDE EFFECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC/ ANTIDEPRESSANT AND NARCOTICS and I
relied on guidance of the Commission and other Government Agencies.
I was guided by Ontario Human Rights Commission right from the beginning and
Commission send me to Labour Board where format of my Application was
amended number of times.
Essentially Apotex's Counsel is imposing on the Tribunal opinion whether or
not the substance of my Application is within the jurisdiction of this
Apotex / Counsel are trying to define Tribunal's jurisdiction and
Apotex appears to believe that it can simply disregard Canadian
Constitution, Law, and all Legislatives and manipulate in to own advantage
all Government Agencies if that will assist it in adversarial tactics
against Citizens. Canadian citizens can have little legal protection from
major corporate interests if a corporation such as Apotex can so readily
oppress an individual.
Company got engaged in intentional malicious conduct violating all statutes
with a reckless indifference. It acted in the face of a perceived risk that
its actions will violate all laws.
DUE TO RETRIBUTION, DISCRIMINATION (AGE, PLACE OF ORIGIN), HERRASMENT
(EXPRESSED CONCERNS IN AREA OF HEALTH AND SAFETY, PRODUCT CONTAMINATION
etc.) Apotex did knowingly and willfully make a materially false, fictitious
and fraudulent statements and representation in a matter within the
jurisdiction of the Ontario Labor Board, WSiB, Ontario Human Rights
Commission, Tribunal and other Government Agencies, DENIED MEDICAL HELP as
well obstructed Canadian Constitution etc.
Apotex committed many counts of perverting the course of justice or
intending to pervert the course of justice, many counts of perjury, criminal
conspiracy, criminal negligence, criminal recruitment of false witnesses,
attempted murder, did cause permanent disability, irreparable damage. Issues
and/or events which occurred after my departure from Employer are also in
full are Apotex's liabilities due to fact that Apotex actively sabotaged
legal /administrative proceedings in all Government Agencies in question.
Preliminary matters are that Apotex In premeditated manner is torturing me
for MANY, MANY years and pending. Company acts without any consideration for
the human rights.
Apotex falsified all records provided by them to Ontario Labor Board, WSiB,
Ontario Human Rights Commission, Tribunal and other Government Agencies
(collectively Government) and engaged its employees in criminal conspiracy
(documented) which untimely further deteriorates my state of health.
Many individuals involved in my Case purposely are omitting very critical
evidence and medical conditions (or are reducing it in to insignificance).
Please focus on 7 years of my unprotected work with toxic / controlled
substances/narcotics , which are known to cause my conditions even in
dosages regularly prescribed by Doctors and much more/worse if over dosed.
Please start to question harmful molecules which Company processed not
reviling nature /name of them and keeping in confidentiality Work Orders and
Safety Data Sheets as well not providing any protection for employees.
Apotex committed many counts of perverting the course of justice or
intending to pervert the course of justice, many counts of perjury, criminal
conspiracy, criminal negligence, criminal recruitment of false witnesses,
attempted murder, did cause permanent disability, irreparable damage.
Company terrorized by many means any one / other employees voicing concerns
about issues with Safety and quality of the products.
CIVIL LIABILITY does ARISE FROM BAD FAITH.
The matter is the one that falls under federal jurisdiction under the
Constitution Act, 1867?
Respondent's inconvenience in finding or locating own witnesses or documents
does not constitute "substantial prejudice, nor does a "simple time delay".
Documents / NOTES can not be lost / misplaced or "not maintained" in the
pharmaceutical Company / Industry unless you do not generate any or
purposely lose them. What about "good documentation practices"?
Policy mandatory in the Industry? Oh, right, Apotex has the Policy only for
Authorities and to use it as a tool for propaganda.
Well, contrarily to Apotex I did observe the Policy in order to assist my
ex- employer in achieving its vision / goals. Unfortunately, despite fact,
that I utilized the Policy of "Good Documentation Practices" in good faith /
into Company's benefit, the Company punished me for it.
Company was #1 only because no one was checking any thing. No mechanisms in
force to control SELF REGULATING PHARMACY!
For years sick people are turning 6' under the ground due to contaminated
Ron McArthur - Apotex’s Senior Vice President
During news media interview (2002 ) Apotex’s Senior Vice President , Operations Ron McArthur offered a very liberal description / assessment of internal situation / non compliance as a Standard Operational Procedure ( SOP ) WITH IN THIS Organization ( Apotex ) which by its nature invalidated all Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). All ingredients (actives, controlled substances and every thing else together on the floors in manufacturing (MFG) / Packaging (PKG) areas / all over.
Apotex for years sacrificed own employees AND FOR MANY YEARS very negatively impacted unfortunate, afflicted, and very much suffering vulnerable people / health products consumers.
Scores of them were pushed over the edge by contamination, over dose (luck of actives) etc.
Justice was not served for those affected those who perished in agony / their families / General Public (somebody’s loved ones) often spending last pennies on meds which suppose to help.
Construction / expansion created mayhem for 6 + years.
Ron McArthur actually provided some real matrix / matrices.
For many years I was denied any and all help from the Government Agencies. Even Welfare Assistance was denied. I had no choice but to eat / drink tea from shrubs / grass, scallenge neighborhoods / garbage for food / pet foods etc..:). After the Ministry of Community and Social Services played games with horrifyingly sick Ontaruio's disabled worker. When I got from the Government $5.00 - $ 7.00 a month due to inflation, the MINISTRY of Community and Social Services was deducting $3.00 a month. Money for every day education, medication, medical dressings, household items, clouding, transportation etp. Abused, terrorized by everyone with a mandate / obligated to assyst / help! That is my fate after working for years , paying Taxes and contributing big time to Society / Government ,etc....:).
STATEMENT OF INCOM for the Guaranteed INCOME SUPLEMENT, the Allowance or Allowance for the Survivor for Payment PERIOD of July 2021 to June 2022 R 21
Re: HUMAN RIGHTS CONCERNS. REPIDEDLY I ASKED GOVERNMENT AGENCIES FOR REPORTING CRIMES AGAINST ME TO POLICE. (“WITH OUT JUST CAUSE - MULTIPLE PROFE UPON REQUEST”).
Pc: www.apotexterror.homestead.com (links on the top of each page), www.pharmaholocaust.com (links on the left side of each page).
2004 - 2021/08/11 17+ years and I did not received yet my disability benefits / ENTITLEMENTS!. Company's Termination Letter is contradicting the letters from Mr. W. Davidson CHRP, and Joan Lowden (Director) as well as Carl W. Peterson (LLP) and Toxicologist Dr. Mitch Sauerhoff, which all were prepared after fact and delivered separately! After period of very extensive KONSTRUCTION!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks to my dedication, hard work, and loyalty I was making $90,000.00 + 2002, 2003 a year. In January 07/2004 I started ewen better. No one suspected otherwise. Ill thought ideas profed different. Due to misrepresentation, my salary in the Report to the Government was misrepresented as a fraction of what I made. As a result of it, instantly I found myself out of work and below the poverty line , suffering tremendously without any income almost for 16+ YEARS. Maybe for Torpharm/ Apotex is time to be forgiving if any forgiving exists and give me a chance for the life I deserve. I worked for Torpharm / Apotex for so many, many years. Sickness made me disabled and not able to deliver what was apparently expected from me. People without ideas, very short on experience and seniority though that at my expense they can make gain. ...:). I WAS THE MOST SENIOR IN THE PLANT ! If I did not come, production did not go. Years of one of THE largest in ONTARIO CONSTRUCTION.
SAMPLE, I'm surprised, that such multi billion dollars Organization like Torpharm / Apotex discarded such exceptional employee like me ( profe upon request) while I got terribly sick due to "no fault - criminal negligence" by unknow employees. Termination papers were prepared by unknow to me people from different Plants on the rusch on very short notice. Samples / benefits of my performance and accomplishments are all ower. Torpharm / Apotex does not terminate unexpectedly sick / impaired people. ......:).
Unfortunately Torpharm / Apotex by not thinking about the true actions of a very few people without any seniority / experience in industry, completely / permanently destroyed my Records of Employment, health, refused me medical help, employment assistance for a long term exceptional employee. Did this for a life term without giving any consideration for the life of another employee, for anything and everything. Did not think about financial safety and security, life in society as we know it. Punished employee for life without reason or by their own reason. VERY SICK CANADIAN WORKER, Very sick neurologically, physically, bed ridden employee sent rutlesly from Government Agency to Government Agency for 16+ years while frutlesly awaiting medical treatment and being unemployed!
I DEMAND, MY OUTDATED DISABILITY BENEFITS ( ENTITLEMENTS ) ARE PAID INSTANTLY. ALL PAID RETROACTIVELY AND/OR FORWARD. NO FURTHER DELAYS DUE TO FRAUD OR OTHER REASONS. 17+ YEARS IS WAY TO MUCH IN EXPENSE O A VICTIM, UNFORTUNATE, SUFFERING CANADIAN WORKERS JUST BECAUSE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES ARE USE TO QULTURE OF CRIME.
About one or two years prior to me being fired from the Company " without just cause' - I think just because I got very sick and did not want to change own "title", every one right across the board got demoted to entry level positions to allow Company to be "RE-STAFFED" regardless of any thing and hire QUALIFIED / not contaminated new PERSONNEL. Company was about to change its name to bypass Regulations and Restrictions and to be able / allowed to add new PATENTS on some more products etc....:). - and they DID.
Are “mutual separations” ???? a real thing?
WHY I , A DISABLED ON THE JOB EXCEPTIONAL CANADIAN WAS TORTURED, ORDINARILY DEFRAUDED BY LARGE EX-EMPLOYER, GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS WITH MANDATES / OBLIGATIONS TO BE OF HELP ! WHY I HAVE TO SUFFER FOR SO LONG TIME DUE TO CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE AND BE DEPENDANT ON STRANGERS WITH BAD INTENTIONS WHILE BEING SICK.!!!!! ????? WHY,WHY WHILE I PAID FOR EVERYTHING FORSELF IN ADVANCE.!!!!!!! THE FRAUD AND CRIME CONTINUES TODAY AND I STRUGGLE WITH ALL OF THOSE ENTITIES WHILE BEING SICK IN STEAD ON FOCUSING ON FAST RECUPERATION.