Apotex - contamination www.apotexterror.homestead.com www.pharmaholocaust.com
I live like a walking death in twilight zone / some where in between death and a life being deprived of all Human Rights and Constitutional / Law
protection by habitual offenders. I was assessed by three (3) independent psychiatrists to eliminate offender's speculations about my insanity
prompting "delusions" etc. All psychiatrists stated clearly, that I am sane /I do NOT have/had any mental illness. No family history of any.
ACCESSORY / ACCOMPLICE TO CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
Government Agencies including OHR Tribunal,Worker Adviser (OWA) did not assist me in any of my efforts to get situation in order and in compliance with CANADIAN JUSTICE SYSTEM.
Dear Sir/Madam,
Thank you very much for your Letter dated Nov. 01/2010 conforming my appeal
on time.
I greatly appreciate your promptness and guidance.
Unfortunately I can not utilize provided by you "helpful" Worker Referral
Information / resources, since I went trough all of them and much more
during my almost seven (7) years of unsuccessful struggle for help and
justice. Please look at bellow attached samples.
I am counting on INDEPENDENCE, JUSTICE AND STRENGHT OF YOUR AGENCY's
Personnel.
Please note, that during years of my communication with variety of
Government Agencies in position of assistance, Lawyers ( all Lawyers
recommended by Law Society of Upper Canada, all in the Phone Book, all
advertised on e-net in the Province of Ontario and many across Canada),
M.P.P.(s), Office of the Worker Adviser (OWA), Legal Aid Ontario, Community
Legal Clinic, etc. I did spend a lot of money (which I had to borrow) on
office supply, postage and miscellaneous items associated with my case.
My Application to OHR Tribunal ALONE required almost 3000 pages of printed /
copied material, plus binders and Registered postage etc. (RESPONDENT's - a
few "standard print outs" pages at the time).
After years of investigation Ministry of Labor, Ontario Ombudsmen etc. did
not have any documents in my File, accept what I did submit!
With assistance of Government Agencies, Apotex managed to turn tables around
and against Criminal Code, Occupational Health and Safety Act obligated me
(a victim) to produce / provide all information / evidence, swamping me with
administrative tasks and huge challenges, redirecting my non existent
resources to challenge dysfunctional System.
All Government Agencies including OHR Tribunal did not assist me in any of
my efforts to get situation in order and in compliance with CANADIAN JUSTICE
SYSTEM.
Contrarily, many Agencies engaged in criminal activities.
Apotex must be proud of their cooperative / criminal performance.
That was one of the Apotex's and Agential Accomplice's tactics - to destroy
me economically and deteriorate my health to the point of fatality.
OHR Tribunal did not help me with financial assistance and guidance to
REASSURE SUCCESS OF MY CASE (against Tribunal's mandate).
Any, even very minor administrative deviation on my behalf did and does
trigger stagnation of proceedings and excuse to impose artificial barriers
on my path to justice.
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES SUPPOSE TO ASIST ME, NOT TO BASH ME.
DELAYS IN RESOLVING OF MY CASE RAPIDLY DETERIORATE APOTEX'S criminal
SITUATION and credibility of Ontario's System/Government.
With time due to some (Class Action, FBI investigation etc.) I may get
Court Order to testify.
Sample Letter to :
"Ms. Patricia Grenier
Registrar - Transition
Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario
March 14/2010
Re: Letter / Decision dated March 11/2010
Dear Ms. Grenier,
Today, the day of March 11/2010 become another black day in life of disabled
and suffering person (a victim) as well as in lives of all Ontarians,
Canadians and humanity in other 115 Countries effected.
Today I started to understand in to full extend a comment made by one of my
former Lawyers, which did sign with me a Retaining Agreement to represent
me.
After long "DISCOVERY" process he announced, that Apotex forces him to
dissolve his Agreement with me (to drop my Case) and Company stated to him,
that "we have every thing -COVERED- AND WE ARE NOT WARRY ABOUT ANY ACTION
TAKEN BY Complainant (we can take care of it)".
Today become apparent, that Apotex very successfully managed to infiltrate
all key/ strategic Government /Public's Institutions with its agents
enabling Company to commit crimes against Society with immunity and to do
damage control if criminal activity goes out of control.
In 2004, at the time when I was critically sick /incapacitated, with very
serious neurological symptoms/problems I inquired with Human Rights
Commission about my situation (on advice of a strenger).
I was denied the right to fill in an Application with Commission. I was
advised that my concerns are of such complex nature that can be dealt with
by ANY jurisdiction. In 2004 Commission number of times denied acceptance of
my Application and any submissions.
I was (and am) horribly suffering from many medical conditions due to
exposure to very toxic substances with out any personal protection and
knowledge about molecules I was forced to work with ( due to strict
confidentiality imposed on every thing by Apotex and notoric not
compliance). Amongst disabilitateing neurological problems I suffered
dissection of speech mechanism , so I was not in position to collaborate on
any thing.
I struggled to generate a few sentences and based on those very limited
sentences Commission determined a jurisdiction which suppose to deal with my
concerns ( I could not comprexend / rationalize almost any thing so I follow
(what I bolived the best advise).
At the time I was told by Commission, that some issues may be of simple
clerical error.
Also I was proactively advised by Commission, that there is no time
limitation on such cases like mine due to strong DISCRETIONARY powers by
Commission/Administrative Tribunals and due to fact that the issues are
involving very important INDUSTRY impacting interest of General Public etc.
As advised I started fruitless process directly with my former employer in
anticipation of resolution/ settlement (documented).
After Apotex and large number of contacted by me Lawyers stone walled me I
contacted repeatedly Commission which was keen on not accepting my
Application.
Eventually I was directed to other Jurisdiction for assistance (Ontario
Labour Relations Board).
Additional information, rationale of argument, evidence, witness's
statements, Doctors/Lawyers evidence, etc. are included in previous
communications/Letters.
Now I understood why Commission repeatedly did refuse to receive my
Application in 2004, why directed me ( a sick and impaired person WITH
COMPROMISED SPEECH MECHANISM AND OTHER VERY SERIOUS NEUROLOGICAL PROBLEMS -I
could not talk, walk, hold a pen nor rationale what is going on-DOCUMENTED
BY WSiB, Psychiatrist and others) to struggle on my own with my former
Employer (efforts to resolve issues are extensively documented) and why
after very long delays it directed me to other jurisdictions instead of
accepting it on its own and why Commission and other Government Agencies,
Boards, Tribunals repeatedly stagnated / delayed/ dismissed my case despite
legitimate allegations supported by hard evidence, witnesses statements,
Doctors diagnosis (ONLY about 10 % of Doctors were willing to generate
letters supporting life threatening medical conditions due to employer's
criminal negligence- now that percentage diminished completely. Doctors are
stateing:" we are very sorry, but we do not want to get involwed in this") ,
professional investigator's Reports, Federal Agencies Reports etc.
The answer is: KEY GOVERNAMENT AGENCIES ARE INFILTRATED BY VERY THE SAME
APOTEX'S AGENTS WHICH ARE DIRECTING COMPLAINANTS FROM THEMSELVES TO
THEMSELVES BUT IN DIFERENT AGENCIES (jurisdictions) WHERE THEY ALSO (
parallel) OCUPPY TOP MANAGERIAL POSITIONS.
IT IS A CRIMINALLY ORGANIZED VISIOUS RING TO DESTROY / demoralize
COMPLAINANTS AND DELUTE LIGITIMATE CASES IN TIME AND OVERWELMING
ADMINISTRATIVE TASKS. THIS IS VERY SERIOUS SYSTEMIC PROBLEM AND IT BECOME
POLITICALLY SENSITIVE.
Now it is apparent why employee's complaints to Ministry of Labour about
personal/ environmental contamination, product contamination etc. went with
out any investigation/ response from the Ministry of Labour. Now it is
understood why Ministry of Labour did not have any records of almost daily
industrial accidents in Facility (employees were getting deadly sick /
injured on daily bases, some got stroke, some heart attack, some died on the
job (new sampler of incoming products died on the job etc.) and most
Personnel after getting sick left the Company in panic.
Company criminally concealed names/ nature of processed products. Company
processed products with out regulatory permits in Facility not approved for
those products (not providing any personal protection for Personnel), did
not post Safety Data Shits and did not disclose short and long term health
hazards do to massive unprotected exposures.
Now it is obvious, why Ministry of Labour did criminally process my
Application under SECTION 50 OF THE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT
violations and AT THE END dismissed it and sarcastically advised me to
litigate against "legal assistance providers" (during imposed on me by
Commission initial period of personal struggle with my former employer I
approached all Lawyers recommended by Law Society of Upper Canada. None was
brave enough to take my case.
Those who did engage in discovery process did this on behalf of Apotex in
order to hold / stagnate my Case for as long period of time as possible.
Tribunal's Rules define /state that mistaken / misleading Lawyers advice /
delay constitute applicant's "Good FAITH").
My Application to Labour Board, after one more year of criminal conspiracy
to delay and derail was dismissed due to apparent 18 months delay (which is
not truth).
Why Labour Board did not use their Jurisprudence/ discretionary power nor
provisions of Occupational Health and Safety Act (R.S.O. 1990.Capter 0.1(5)
which state "on an inquiry by the Board into a complaint filled under
subsection (2), the burden of proof that an employer or person acting on
behalf of an employer did not act contrary to subsection (1) lies upon the
employer or the person acting on behalf of the employer.R.S.O.
1990,c.0.1,s.50(5),1998,c.8,s.56(2).
Answer: my Case was send from Commission (Ms. Rowan and accomplices) to
Labour Board (Ms. Rowan and accomplices).
Dismissal "Decision" was articulated to me in the same terminology and in
the same sentences.
Every Government Agency to which I was referred to by Commission did hold my
case for maximum period of time and dismissing it due to "time factor",
every time adding a period in which they did hold my File. Each Agency
refused my Application if I did have any thing pending some where else
(documented).
Now Tribunal claims 4 years delay which Commission did fabricate /
accumulate on my behalf due to its own criminal conspiracy. ALL PERIOD OF MY
EMPLOYMENT AND ALL PERIOD AFTER THAT CONSTITUTES VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS
CODE. All acts / facts do constitute a violation of the Human Rights Code.
The matter is the one that falls under federal jurisdiction under the
Constitution Act, 1867?
"Late applications to the Tribunal:
(2) A person may apply under subsection (1) after the expiry of the time
limit under that subsection if the Tribunal is satisfied that the delay was
incurred in good faith and no substantial prejudice will result to any
person affected by the delay. 2006, c. 30, s. 5."
Tribunal rules
43. (1) The Tribunal may make rules governing the practice and procedure
before it. 2006, c. 30, s. 5.
(3) Without limiting the generality of subsection (1), the Tribunal rules
may,
(a) provide for and require the use of hearings or of practices and
procedures that are provided for under the Statutory Powers Procedure Act or
that are alternatives to traditional adjudicative or adversarial procedures;
CHAPTER 5: SECTION 34
Quality Standards
. It is important to underscore that this is discretion. There may be an
absence of good faith and the presence of substantial prejudice, or both,
yet the Commission can still choose to deal with the complaint. This may
arise, for example, where a complaint involves important industry or sector
wide concerns that have eluded investigation in other cases.
. However, there is no discretion where the Commission finds that there is
the presence of good faith and also finds an absence of substantial
prejudice. In that case, the Commission must "deal with" the complaint:
Brome v. OHRC (1999), 35 C.H.R.R. D/469 (Div. Ct.).
Was the delay incurred in "good faith"?
. The term "good faith" has been interpreted in two ways. The broader
reading requires an absence of bad faith or an ulterior motive. The narrower
reading is that good faith actually requires more, i.e., the presence of
some positive or good. While the matter has not yet been directly addressed
in a human rights case, the Commission has generally adopted the narrower
approach. In other words, the complainant must provide some positive reason
for the delay in filing the complaint.
Decisions final
45.8 Subject to section 45.7 of this Act, section 21.1 of the Statutory
Powers Procedure Act and the Tribunal rules, a decision of the Tribunal is
final and not subject to appeal and shall not be altered or set aside in an
application for judicial review or in any other proceeding unless the
decision is patently unreasonable. 2006, c. 30, s. 5; 2009, c. 33, Sched. 2,
s. 35 (3).
Why Ms. Caroline Rowan did not see it? Incompetence or criminal conspiracy?
Now it is understood why Apotex many times discarded huge volumes of very
toxic waste waters in to Lake Ontario and no one noticed any thing etc. (
Ontario Environment Minister Dan Newman introduced a bill October 10 in the
Legislature that would give Ontario the toughest fines and longest jail
terms in Canada for major environmental offences.
The Environmental Penalties Statute Law Amendment Act, 2000 would amend the
penalty structure of the Environmental Protection Act, Ontario Water
Resources Act and the Pesticides Act. The proposed penalties would:
. Increase the maximum fine for a first conviction of a major offence for a
corporation from $1 million to $6 million per day, and for a subsequent
conviction from $2 million to $10 million per day.
. Increase the maximum fine for a first conviction of a major offence for an
individual from $100,000 to $4 million per day, and for subsequent
convictions from $200,000 to $6 million per day.
. Increase the maximum jail terms for a person convicted of a major offence
from two years to five years.
The penalty structure in the Ontario Water Resources Act would be amended to
ensure that these new tough penalties apply to the most serious offences
under the new Drinking Water Protection Regulation, including failure to
report samples that exceed standards and failure to ensure minimum levels of
treatment.
Mr. Newman has also announced the creation of a SWAT team, which will be a
highly mobile compliance, inspection and enforcement unit.)
Ontario's Commission as well as Tribunal of Human Rights is perpetuating
culture of crime and violations of Human Rights in Ontario (operates as a
coordination centre, predator / violator of human rights). Acts on behalf of
Organizations violating all Laws and Legislatives and committing crimes
against Citizens.
Tribunal acts as a coordinating link amongst Government Agencies committing
crimes against Citizens.
Apotex managed to compromise operational integrity, mandate etc. of key
Government Agencies, Boards, Commissions, some Tribunals, which suppose to
protect General Public.
Apotex developed integrated and very successful network of crime in Ontario.
Now it is obvious, why Ontario become safe haven for big Corporations
engaged in criminal activities?
Now we know how this happened, that private Corporation controls Lawyers,
Doctors, Government Agencies etc.?
OHR Tribunal as well as Ontario Labour Board, WSiB, Ontario Ombudsmen,
Ontario Human Rights Commission, Worker Advisor Office, Fair Practices
Commission and many other Government Agencies which repeatedly refused to
report to Police crimes against me and General Public.
OHR Commission, OHR Tribunal, WSiB, Labour Board as well as other Government
Agencies refused to report acts of Domestic and Global terrorism to
Authorities/ Police.
Apotex become a bully who harms / attacks people who express concerns in
area of Public Safety or are weaker or unable to defend themselves. Apotex
exposed own employees to appalling and atrocious conditions at work.
Defendant, Apotex / Counsel displayed bad faith, arrogance, disrespect to
Canadian Constitution, Human Rights, whole Justice System, Public Order.
Tribunals etc.
Apotex is defiant, not regretful, with out remorse, not willing to correct
wrong doings. Company, OHR Tribunal as well as other Government Agencies
(collectively GOVERNMENT) got engaged in intentional malicious conduct
violating all statutes with a reckless indifference. It acted in the face of
a perceived risk that its actions will violate all laws. Apotex /Counsel
after 6 years of disabling me, torturing me, denials of medical help,
denials of Constitutional and Law protection as well as many other criminal
acts eventually admitted all allegations. Apotex refuse to plea "Guilty",
and in further criminal acts decided to challenge my Application on
technicalities / alleged preliminary issues.
Apotex and all involved in sabotaging of my allegations must be INDICTED and
convicted on multiple offences / crime (Criminal Code, Constitutional
provisions, Bill - 45, Bill 107 and other Law provisions.
I was and am tortured by Apotex, Ontario Labor Board, WSiB, Ontario's
Ombudsmen Office, Office of the Worker Adviser, Ontario Human Rights
Commission/Tribunal and some more Agencies. Canadian Government institutions
mandated to assist General Public in time of misfortune, suffer and despair
selected to engage in criminal activities and assist criminal Corporation
which is stone waling an Ontarian / victim with life threatening medical
conditions. Those Institutions deprived me from Constitutional and Law
protection. Apotex and its accomplices denied me medical help, deprived me
of all means of sustaining myself and are not regretful. Apotex, Ontario
Labor Board, WSiB, Ontario's Ombudsmen Office sentenced me and my family for
life of suffer, despair, hunger and poverty. Apotex, Ontario Labor Board,
WSiB, Ontario's Ombudsmen Office shattered my and my family's dreams and
future. Apotex many times derailed my attempts to get help and justice.
IT IS SUBMITED THAT APOTEX'S CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR IS EXTREME SO FORTH IT IS
EXTREMELY IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT AFTER SO MANY YEARS OF RETRIBUTION,
DISCRIMINATION, HERRASEMENT, DENAIL OF MEDICAL HELP APOTEX /COUNSEL ADMITS
ALL MY ALLEGATIONS (RESPONSE ON ALLEGED PRELIMINARY ISSUES, PAGE 3, OCT
22/2009 UNDER "JURISDICTION" ( ), BUT THIS TIME AROUND CLAIMING THAT THE
ALLEGATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS CODE.
DUE TO APOTEX'S TORTURE, RETRIBUTION, DISCRIMINATION, HERRASEMENT DURRING MY
EMPLOYMENT AND AFTER AND DENAIL OF MEDICAL HELP I SUSTAINED INJURIES AT WORK
AND PERMANENT DISABILITIES SUFFERING A GREAT DEAL!
I was under influence / heavily impaired on psychiatric / antidepressants,
narcotics and other potent medications before, during and after occurrence.
Company in acts of retribution and criminal negligence exposed me to highly
potent / dangerous toxic substances for 6.5 years period with out any
Personal / Collective Protection Equipment.
- I was profoundly sick at the time of occurrence and after (I could not
talk, hold a pan, walk, rationalize what was happening).
- Company abused my condition and committed crimes against me.
- Company deceived me with promises of a new job with out exposure to toxic
substances at the time of occurrence and after.
You, Ms. Grenier are one of the top "links" in Tribunal's structure
(additionally residing in Toronto's Branch of Amnesty International (see
below info). Despite that you did not hesitate to entrust adjudication of my
Case to an incompetent, acting in bad faith and on Apotex's service "MEMBER"
of the Tribunal with out any expertise in investigative techniques /
methodology of Human Rights Law and Cases.
Ms. C. Rowan lacks knowledge in medical area and she did not seek any expert
opinions from World's Health Organization, Poison Centre, Advocates for
Mental Disability Group, Psychiatry Advocacy Groups nor Center for Desise
Control any other helpful expert sources. Her goal was to dismiss my
Application for any reason (because my Case is pending with WSiB and
fabricated apparent delay).
Tribunal inquiry
44. (1) At the request of a party to an application under this Part, the
Tribunal may appoint a person to conduct an inquiry under this section if
the Tribunal is satisfied that,
(a) an inquiry is required in order to obtain evidence;
(b) the evidence obtained may assist in achieving a fair, just and
expeditious resolution of the merits of the application; and
(c) it is appropriate to do so in the circumstances. 2006, c. 30, s. 5.
Powers on inquiry
(6) A person conducting an inquiry may,
(a) request the production for inspection and examination of documents or
things that are or may be relevant to the inquiry;
Tribunal (Ms. Rowan) ignored all of the McGuinty Government's 10 key
commitments on what Bill 107 will deliver to the public, including
discrimination victims. See that full list of commitments.
In summary, the Government has made these 10 commitments:
1. Commitment of free legal representation for all human rights
complainants.
2. Commitment that the Human Rights Legal Support Centre will investigate
the cases of people they represent.
3. Commitment of the Human Rights Legal Support Centre to meet with everyone
who wants legal representation.
4. Commitment to provide legal services across Ontario.
5. Commitment of Human Rights Legal Support Centre to pay for expert
witnesses for their clients.
6. Commitment to having human rights cases decided within one year of filing
a complaint under Bill 107.
7. Commitment that legal support to be provided to all regardless of income.
8. Commitment to establish Anti-Racism Secretariat and Disability Rights
Secretariat at the Human Rights Commission.
9. Commitment that Human Rights Commission will become stronger force for
human rights.
10. Commitment that Bill 107 responds to the Cornish and La Forest reports.
The "Member's" adjudication of my Claim is criminal and in gross conflict of
interest SO FORTH HER DECISIONS ARE CRIMINAL, INNVALID, NOT BINDING AND MUST
BE REVOKED BY TRIBUNAL IMEDIETLY!
Ms. Caroline Rowan, a Tribunal "Member" ignored all evidence, witness's
statements, Doctor's statements, WSiB's Investigation Reports, Canadian
Constitution, Chapter of Human Rights, Bill - 45, Bill-107 and all other
Laws /Legislatives INCLUDING RATIONALE OF THE ARGUMENT.
Member adjudicating my Claim (Ms. Caroline Rowan) demonstrated incompetence
or extreme, criminal attitude / behavior ( bad faith ) total ignorance, lack
of knowledge in medical area of my situation/Application as well as she
interpreted Tribunal's Rules / Law in criminally BIAS manner.
She grossly obstructed Tribunal's ADJUDICATIVE process by being in gross
conflict of interest and ignoring all evidence and my medical condition. She
assumed position of Facilitator, Accomplice/ accessory to the crimes against
me and General Public.
Due to scope of criminal activities it must be classified as crimes against
HUMANITY.
Caroline Rowan, of Toronto, was appointed to the Ontario Labour Relations
Board as Vice-chair in 1999.
Ms. Caroline Rowan resides as a full time Vice-Chair at the Ontario Labour
Relations Board (another Administrative Tribunal which under her management
criminally sabotaged my Application under SECTION 50 OF THE OCCUPATIONAL
HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT), where she adjudicates matters arising under a
variety of labour and employment related statutes and acts as an arbitrator
of construction industry grievances. As I communicated to Tribunal before,
Labour Board sabotages my Application after very prolonged time of
conspiracy and delay.
She is also a part-time (with out remuneration so forth with out interest in
being compliant) Member of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario and acts as
a private arbitrator and mediator (not Adjudicator!). Her fife year tenure
ends in few months (25 Oct 2010) so she was selected to perform dirty work
for a Tribunal in the storage Room. She is not qualified nor she has frame
of mind to adjudicate any and especially complex cases of Human Rights Code/
Charter violations!
Since her call to the Bar in 1991, she has worked exclusively in the field
of labour relations and employment law. She was in private practice for many
years providing counsel on a wide range of labour and employment matters.
Appears, that Ms. Rowan does not meet requirements to be adjudicating such
Cases of Human Rights violations.
(Requirements: The selection process for the appointment of members of the
Tribunal is a competitive process. The criteria to be applied in assessing
candidates include the following: Experience, knowledge or training with
respect to human rights law and issues; Aptitude for impartial adjudication;
Aptitude for applying the alternative adjudicative practices and procedures
that may be set out in the Tribunal rules. She is taking a risk to be bias
and in conflict with Tribunal's Rules and Canada's Law).
So one can conclude that under Ms. Rowan's influence my Application to the
Commission was not accepted on time, that under her manipulation I was
forced to act on my own in initial stages (2004 -2005) and was stagnated in
the process.
That is why after that I was directed from Commission to ONOTHER Ms. Rowan's
Office in the Labour Board where she further sabotaged my Application and
after another year of delays dismissed it on bogus "time delay" bases. In
all Agencies People were not interested in assisting me and punishing the
offender.
All those representatives were stating to me" do not call us, we will call
you". If I wanted to protest or inquire periodically II was threatened with
dismissal of my Application When I wanted to record such conversations I was
refused consent to do so.
From Labour Board I was directed by Ms. Rowan (her subordinates) back to her
Commission's Office where eventually my Commission's Application was
accepted, but only to get stocked dormant in unofficial Files awaiting
enactment of Bill 107.
Commission conducted number of sabotaging acts / movements forcing me to
re-apply again this time to Tribunal.
It is submitted, that Member's decision concerning my Application contain ad
hoc rationalizations to avoid finding out, that Company's activities are
criminal and Respondent should be declared as the one committing crimes
against humanity, committing acts of domestic and Global terrorism and
should be investigated by Amnesty International, FBI, Ministry of Public
Safety and trialed by Tribunal in Strasburg for such crimes. Now it is
clear, why Government Agencies did refuse to accept my Applications in
overlapping manner if I did have any situation pending somewhere else.
Maximal delay tactics.
Criminal individuals implanted in Public's Institutions now how to work
SYSTEM to make it useless/ failing the Citizens (in distress.) they suppose
serve.
Apotex subjected me to the most horrifying experiences imaginable. BEYOND
ANY DOUBT I WAS EXPOSED TO THE DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES WITH OUT ANY PROTECTION
AND THAT THEY CAUSED THE ADVERSE EFFECTS AND INJURIES I NOW SUFFER
(Documented). As result of Company's negligence (exposure to advanced
structural composite materials /chemicals used in the manufacturing
processes which have been classified as to have a co- carcinogenic and/or
synergistic effect I am disabled. I am suffering a great deal with life
threatening medical conditions not able to afford groceries, needed
medications or to pay any of my financial dues. I am not able to perform any
chores around my residence, forced to relay on assistance. I was "swimming
in" / a massive exposure with out any protection to a potent
immunosuppressant, brain function controlling drugs (psychiatric),
antidepressants and narcotics which overwhelmed my system.
The symptoms of Paxil withdrawal are among the most horrifying experiences
imaginable. The symptoms can take your life and rip it to shreds, mocking
your dignity and stealing your freedom. They ravage your soul. They deaden
your spirit.
Ironically, death often seems like a blessing, so great is the pain of Paxil
Withdrawal Symptoms.
Taking Paxil is like putting a loaded gun to your head. You better be damn
sure you need it before you start.
The withdrawal process can mirror every depiction of hell. The paxil
withdrawals can truly test your sanity. Perhaps the two worse mental
expressions of the paxil withdrawals are the overwhelming feelings of being
isolated, cut off from the world and even from loved ones, and the fear of
permanently losing your sanity. The isolation stems in large part from the
inability to express or even understand what is happening. Nobody can really
look inside another person and know the degree of their suffering. The paxil
withdrawals have always reminded me of the concentration camps of World War
II. Some of the suffering is unimaginable, and certainly much is horrifying.
The bottom line - no one knows ahead of time if they will be one of the
unfortunate who suffer horrendously, or if they will be spared the ravages
of the paxil withdrawals.
Drugs, by definition - are poisons to the body. All drugs are poisons.
Sometimes, however, a person's state has reached the point where a poison is
the best option.
Of all the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI's) Paxil is
generally considered to be the most potent. It also has the greatest number
of side effects as well as the most severe withdrawal symptoms. There are
hundreds of side effects of paxil. Paxil is nothing but a poison that causes
all sorts of painful, unpleasant side effects. And sometimes the side
effects don't even show themselves until the user attempts to stop taking or
being exposed to paxil.
It is a compilation of my own experience as well as that of the thousands.
The symptoms redefine the term nightmare. Their nature is such, that you
will find yourself questioning your sanity on a continual basis. Certain
lethargy and a depression that was not there beforehand seems to have taken
hold.
It appears that Paxil withdrawal can come in many variations.
In regard to DELAY, GOOD FAITH and other issues please refer to the my
letter to Registrar - Transition Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (Nov.
18/2009) and all other submissions which are voiding all rationale,
conclusions, persuades made maliciously and in BAD FAITH by Ms. Caroline
Rowan ("MEMBER"/ a Public's enemy).
Apotex did knowingly and willfully make a materially false, fictitious and
fraudulent statements and representation in a matter within the jurisdiction
of the Ontario Labor Board, WSiB, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Tribunal
and other Government Agencies, DENIED MEDICAL HELP as well obstructed
Canadian Constitution etc.
Apotex committed many counts of perverting the course of justice or
intending to pervert the course of justice, many counts of perjury, criminal
conspiracy, criminal negligence, criminal recruitment of false witnesses,
attempted murder, did cause permanent disability, irreparable damage. Issues
and/or events which occurred after my departure from Employer are also in
full are Apotex's liabilities due to fact that Apotex actively sabotaged
legal /administrative proceedings in all Government Agencies in question.
Preliminary matters are that Apotex In premeditated manner is torturing me
for MANY, MANY years and pending. Company acts without any consideration for
the human rights.
Apotex falsified all records provided by them to Ontario Labor Board, WSiB,
Ontario Human Rights Commission, Tribunal and other Government Agencies
(collectively Government) and engaged its employees in criminal conspiracy
(documented) which untimely further deteriorates my state of health.
Apotex denied me medical help, Constitutional and Law protection, deprived
mi of ability to get new job and/or provide for my self.
(Pc: AFTER FOLSYFING ALL SUBMISSIONS / EVIDENCE AND REFUSING TO REPORT
SITUATION TO THE POLICE etc. WSiB CRIMINALLY DENIED MY CLAIM VERY LONG TIME
AGO.
OFFICE OF WORKER ADVISER DID CRIMINALLY SEND MY FILE FROM ONE PERSON TO
ANOTHER, FROM ONE OFFICE TO ONOTHER AND EVENTUALLY STOPPED TO COMMUNICATE
WITH ME AT ALL. ON THE BEGINNING (AS IN ALL OTHER AGENCIES) I WAS TOLD NOT
TO CALL/ INQUIRE ABOUT MY CASE (DO NOT CALL US, WE WILL CALL YOU).
FEW DAYS BEFORE TRIBUNAL'S DECISION WORKER ADVISER RE-APPEARED AND STARTED
TO DUPLICATE WHAT ALREADY WAS DONE LONG, LONG TIME AGO.
"CRIMINAL ENTANGLES" EVIDENCE AND A VICTIM.
WHOLE PROCES IS DISCRIMINATORY AND CRIMINAL WITH IN IT SELF.
NO ONE IS OUT THERE TO HELP ?????!!!!!!)
Apotex subjected me to the most horrifying experiences imaginable.
Apotex (my former employer) ravaged me (my system)! Apotex exposed me with
out any personal / collective protection to well over 4000 very potent
chemicals / actives.
We are faced with unethical corporation that engaged in illegal production
of prohibited products, violated all rules of the corporate system and in
the process sacrificed health of own employees.
Pharmaceutical Corporation with its mandate to bring relief to all who
suffer, disregarded safety and for almost 7 years exposed me with out any
personal protection to very potent products.
As result of Apotex's negligence (exposure to advanced structural composite
materials /chemicals used in the manufacturing processes which have been
classified as to have a co- carcinogenic and/or synergistic effect) I AM
DISABLE.
Toxic build up of the drugs and/or its metabolites can be fatal.
Company criminally concealed names/ nature of processed products. Company
processed products with out regulatory permits in Facility not approved for
those products (not providing any personal protection for Personnel), did
not post Work Orders nor Safety Data Shits and did not disclose short and
long term health hazards do to massive unprotected exposures.
As result of Company's negligence (exposure to advanced structural composite
materials /chemicals used in the manufacturing processes which have been
classified as to have a co- carcinogenic and/or synergistic effect I am
disabled!
Apotex, by not providing employees with any product info and personal
protection promoted products induced violence at work / antidepressant
nightmares. (Withdrawal can often be more dangerous than continuing on a
medication. It is important to withdraw extremely slowly from these drugs,
usually over a period of a year or more (conditions may not be reversible
and may last a life time), under the supervision of a qualified specialist -
often damage is permanent). "Severe Body & Brain Damaging Side-Effects of
Antidepressants"
I was physically and verbally attacked many times at work / in Facility by
individuals high on drugs.
As all Operators and other Personnel I got massive exposure to unidentified
product (s )- exposed to chemicals in processes.
Company terrorized by many means any one / other employees voicing concerns
about issues with Safety and quality of the products.
Employees worked with out any PPE (Personal Protection Equipment) and
sustained sever injuries on daily bases.
Company did not provide First Aid materials and employees had to supply
themselves in "One dollar stores " with chip medical supply which on regular
bases were ending up processed in the products.
I am suffering a great deal with life threatening medical conditions not
able to afford groceries, needed medications nor to pay any of my financial
dues.
We did have on daily bases incidents/accidents and substantial product
spills.
I got massive and unprotected exposure to unidentified product (s ) in /
during out of control accident (we did have many accidents) when one of not
approved new products proved to be volatile and during process exploded
causing inferno, burning/baking for period of time while releasing toxic
fumes and causing collateral damage to equipment and infrastructure.
Pc: SAMPLE -WORKER ADVISER - AS CRIMINAL AS IT CAN GET
Originally Investigator in Worker Adviser did very professional, diligent, unbiased, merits oriented processing of my Files, but right after his conclusions and Rapport Apotex intervened and my Files were transferred to other individual in other Worker Adviser Office where Manager Margaret Townsend collapsed processing and closed them as an excuse claiming that I do have some “misgivings” about W.A’s ABILITY TO REPRESENT ME.
Margaret Townsend (Manager - Worker Adviser) started very damaging process and while asked questions she stated that Worker Adviser was NOT retained to represent my best interest!
Are “mutual separations” ???? a real thing?
