Apotex - contamination     www.apotexholocaust.com            www.pharmaholocaust.com
I live like a walking death in twilight zone / some where in between death and a life being deprived of all Human Rights and Constitutional / Law 
protection by habitual offenders. I was assessed by three (3) independent psychiatrists to eliminate offender's speculations about my insanity 
prompting "delusions" etc. All psychiatrists stated clearly, that I am sane /I do NOT have/had any mental illness. No family history of any.
FILE PROVIDED BY WSiB
Dear Sir / Madam, 


Thank you very much for very professional preparation of documents for my 
Case which I received on Feb 22/ 2011.
Amongst I received and reviewed FILE PROVIDED BY WSiB (volume 1& 2) and I am 
shocked to see how "fatally flawed" was investigative /adjudicative process 
conducted by WSiB.
Simply it is not possible to logically follow the pathway taken by the 
adjudicator (s).
WSiB provided Fragmented / selected / ILLEGITIMATE / not readable copies of 
Documents / Reports, arranged in illogical manner.
*Most of my correspondence to WSiB is missing.
*My letters included in the File are decimated.
*Sentences from Doctor's Reports are "cut /paste" by Adjudicator (s) out of 
context in order to negatively impact my Case.
*Adjudicator's conclusions portrait me as an uncooperative / difficult, 
some haw fraudulent Complainant while not indicating facts, that I was / am 
very sick / not mobile and I was constantly miss guided, purposely confused 
/ run around , patronized. I was defrauded by Adjudicators giving me 
contradicting requests / orders in order to exhaust me / my resources and 
derail my Claim.
Example:
*I was ordered to obtain Employment and CPP Records from Government on my 
own other wise I was accused of non cooperation. It was for me a long and 
difficult process.
Then while I got it, Adjudicator refused to honor them under pretense that 
WSiB has to obtain all Records on its own because it must be from unbiased 
source.
*Next time Adjudicator requested /ordered me to obtain by my self Medical 
Records from the Hospital.
Again I had to struggle to get in to Hospital, pay Fee and send it to 
Adjudicator (WSiB). Again it was a long and painful process because of my 
medical disabling conditions / financial situation.
After that again, Adjudicator informed me, that she (WSiB) MUST GET THOSE 
RECORDS INDEPENDENTLY IN UNBIAS MANNER. Again it takes months to get that 
request fulfilled etc.
In such manner WSiB was dealing with every thing involving my Claim.
*WSiB included in forwarded to you File old Reports from my Doctors which 
I apparently did "alter" by removing Doctors names in order to protect them 
from WSiB's harassment, instead of attaching not "altered" replacement ( 
full set of Reports) which I promptly re - send on Adjudicator's request.
*WSiB purged my File out of Dr. JeeJeebhoy's (cardiologist) statement 
"NUMBER OF TIMES HE TRIED TO SAY TO ME, THAT HIS MEDICAL CONDITIONS ARE WORK 
RELATED, BUT I REFUSED TO BELIVE HIM"! - and she started to treat me for 
illusionally condition which I did not have and as result of her activity I 
did end up on ER in the Hospital!
*Also WSiB / Adjudicators did conceal / not take for consideration 
Dermatologist's letter send directly to WSiB INDICATEING / CONFORMING MY 
"VITILIGO "AS AN OCUPATIONAL DESISE RESULTING FROM WORK PLACE EXPOSURES etc. 
Adjudicators insisted on denying my "Vitiligo" claim despite Dermatologist's 
(Doctor from Hospital's Occupational Health Clinic) LETTER CLEARLI 
/DEFINITELY DIAGNOSING THIS CONDITION AS OCCUPATIONAL and despite provided 
by me Literature and other doctors diagnoses.
*WSiB includes some Record / "my" Application to WSiB which apparently I 
forwarded many years ago and which WSiB with valor denied, while truths 
are that cited Application was pro- actively processed and forwards by Union 
at the work place during STRIKE period while Company started to ship 
production out to Long Beach - California.
I never was out of work because of alleged "claimed disability" -"A HEARING 
LOSS" and I did not precede ON MY OWN with that Application at any point in 
time. THAT IS THE REASON, WHY MY APLICATION WAS CLOUSED NOT DENIED!
* WSiB CLAIMS THAT I DID NOT HAVE DOCTOR's / MEDICAL EXAMS DURING 2004 - 
2005 PERIOD.
My irregular examinations during 2004-2005 years were results of number of 
factors:
*I did not have a family Doctor after I moved from one CITY to another
*I was very sick and I could not get around in order to get new Physician 
(no Doctor wanted to take a new and sick patient).
*Contacted Doctors did not want to talk about work relations with my medical 
problems. Wanted to treat me for imaginary conditions while deteriorating my 
health.
*I did not have any means of transportation nor any resources to help my 
self while suffering depression, Parkinsonism and very many other very 
horrifying physical/neurological (impaired) problems and list can go on..:).
Dear Sir, please PREVENT Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti 
LLP) and Ms. K. Koss (Apotex) on Criminal Grounds of Inadmissibility / 
committing acts which constitute the essential elements of a crime involving 
moral turpitude ( FROUD, CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY AND MANY MORE) , from 
participation in WSIAT's adjudicative process. An attempt or conspiracy to 
commit such a crime is included in this ground. They committed/ committing 
acts which constitute the essential elements of a violation or conspiracy to 
violate many laws / regulations in Canada.
The convictions arose not from a single trial or arose from a single scheme 
of conduct involving moral turpitude but from years long PATERN OF 
BEHAVIOUR.(evidence).
Those individuals engaged in criminal activities on behalf of Criminal 
Corporation FOR MANY YEARS AND THEY MUST BE STOPED!
I know /have reason to believe that those individuals are known assisters, 
abettors, conspirators, colluders with others in the illicit acts to 
torture, discriminate, denie medical help to me / a disabled person.
It is submitted , that Apotex / Counsel, Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely 
Thorup Angeletti LLP) as well as Ms. K. Koss (Apotex) should be prevented 
from abuse and obstruction of WSIAT's adjudicative process and from making 
any frivolous, vexatious , trivial , made in bad faith suggestions with out 
any merit / scientific / legal bases further tormenting/ torturing me /a 
victim. Thos individuals should be charged with Contempt of WSIAT and all 
other Administrative Boards, Commissions, Tribunals processes etc.
Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. K. Koss 
(Apotex) falsified all records provided by them to all Government Agencies 
and engaged others / employees in criminal conspiracy (documented) which 
untimely further deteriorated(s) my state of health.
Those individuals purposely are omitting very critical evidence and medical 
conditions (or are reducing it in to insignificance).
For many years those individuals were committing crimes against me / a 
victim by falsifying/ concealing evidence / Documents, soliciting criminal 
witnesses etc.
Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. K. Koss 
(Apotex) got engaged in intentional malicious conduct on behalf of Criminal 
Corporation violating all statutes with a reckless indifference. They acted 
in the face of a perceived risk that their actions will violate all laws, 
torture and destroy / kill suffering, sick person.
They perpetuated TORTURE, TORMENT, RETRIBUTION, DISCRIMINATION and 
HERRASMENT etc.
Mr. Carl Peterson, (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. Koss did 
knowingly and willfully make a materially false, fictitious and fraudulent 
statements and representation in a matter within the jurisdiction of the 
Ontario Labor Board, WSiB, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Tribunal and 
other Government Agencies, in the process DENIED MEDICAL HELP as well as 
obstructed Canadian Constitution, Legal System etc.
Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. Koss 
committed many counts of perverting the course of justice or intending to 
pervert the course of justice, many counts of perjury, criminal conspiracy, 
criminal negligence, criminal recruitment of false witnesses, attempted 
murder, did contribute to my permanent disability, irreparable damage. 
Issues and/or events which occurred after my departure from Employer are 
also in full are Apotex's (Mr. Peterson's -Company's Counsel and Ms. Koss as 
accomplices /executors ) liabilities due to fact that those individuals on 
behalf of Apotex actively sabotaged legal /administrative proceedings in all 
Government Agencies in question. Preliminary matters are that Mr. Peterson 
(Company's Counsel) and Ms. Koss (Apotex) in premeditated manner are 
torturing me for MANY, MANY years and pending. They / Company /accomplices 
act without any consideration for the human rights and my well being despite 
their awareness of my situation and familiarity with my File.
Apotex is defiant, not regretful, with out remorse, not willing to correct 
wrong doings.
Mr. Carl Peterson,(Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. K. Koss 
(Apotex) falsified or concealed all records provided by them to Ontario 
Labor Board, WSiB, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Tribunal and other 
Government Agencies (collectively Government) and engaged other people in 
criminal conspiracy (documented) which untimely further deteriorates my 
state of health. On behalf of Company they committed many counts of 
perverting the course of justice or intending to pervert the course of 
justice, many counts of perjury, criminal conspiracy, criminal negligence, 
criminal recruitment of false witnesses, attempted murder, did contribute to 
permanent disability, irreparable damage.
Those individuals got involved in my Case, purposely were omitting 
/altering very critical evidence and medical conditions (or were reducing it 
in to insignificance) and were paid for it while limiting my professional 
and personal life, making challenging my social life, destroyed my marriage, 
imposed extreme hardship on my family and relatives/friends and in vicious / 
malicious manner on on going bases are preventing me from enjoying my 
Constitutional Right to obtain medical help, be able to provide for myself 
etc.
In near future I may select to proceed with CIVIL/ CRIMINAL/ LEGAL ACTIOMN 
AGAINST Mr. Carl Peterson , his Firm (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) 
and Ms. K. Koss (Apotex).
Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP):
*Despite his OATH TO HER MAJESTY "JUSTICE" TO SERVE LOYALLY, JUSTIFETLY 
THOSE IN NEED /JUSTICE SYSTEM, unfortunately he selected to utilize his 
knowledge / expertise in criminal, amoral, unprincipled manner. He explored 
/utilized gross deficiencies of the Regulatory System and acted against very 
sick /disadvantaged / UNREPRESENTED ex-employee of criminal Corporation 
contributing great deal to my suffer and to my misery for many, many years.
* Mr. Carl Peterson WITH OUT HASITATION COLLECTED HIS HIGH SALLARY, WHILE 
FOR YEARS DESTROYING SICK / SUFFERING PERSON NOT ABLE TO AFORD MEDICATION , 
GROCERIES AND ANY THING ELSE AND SPENDING YEARS BEING BEDRIDDEN IN 
EXCRUCIATING PAIN.
*He could not restrain his bad impulses.
*He prevented me from access to Lawyers, to the legal system, to justice!
*Mr. Carl Peterson did every thing in his capacity to make me unsuccessful 
in my drive for help and justice despite his awareness of my medical 
conditions / personal situation and the evidence conforming my allegations.
*Mr. Carl Peterson directly disrespected me twice in the period of my 
struggle while during Mediation process in Labour Board he abandoned the 
proceedings and left the Conference Room with out saying any thing (out of 
the blue he got up and left the proceedings).
*The same behaviour he demonstrated second time around during Mediation at 
Human Rights Commission living Room with out saying a world (out of the blue 
he got up and left the proceedings).
*Mr. Carl Peterson wants to participate in judicial process conducted by 
WSIAT but he is not in position to make any decisions nor he has any 
authorisations to act on behalf of the Company to mediate any thing ( he 
did not forward any documents supporting his powers accept Participation 
Authorisation). The same situation was every were else.
*Appears, that Mr. Carl Peterson wants yet again to derail this time around 
WSIAT'S PROCES.
*This is fundamentally undemocratic and not acceptable!
Legal profession changed very negatively in Canada.
It becomes a business interested in making profit not making judgments based 
on merits.
*Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) becomes enabler for 
Apotex! He manipulated system/ Government Agencies in order to torture, 
torment, deny of all civil/ constitutional rights, medical help to a 
disabled person etc.
*"EVERY LAWYER IS GOING TO GO IN TO THE OFFICE TODAY AND COMMIT FROUD"- A 
TOP LEGAL SCHOLAR AND EX-BAY STREET LAWYER PHILIP SLAYTON TALKS ABOUT HOW 
LAWYERS BECOME GREADY, UNPRINCIPLED ENABLERS OF THE RICH - THE CORRUPTION 
OF THIS PROFESSION . "LAWYERS ARE RATS!"
Ms. K. Koss (Apotex):
. Despite numerous letters from WSiB demanding Safety Data from Employer, 
Ms. K. Koss for many months stagnated process claiming, that SHE MUST 
PREPARE /fabricate THEM (SHE DID SORTE OUT WHAT WAS IN SUPPORT OF MY CLAIM) 
and provided selective / bias info.
. Ms. K. Koss obtain "list of products" that I was exposed to (?) from 
dysfunctional employee who during his employment created an accident at work 
place and he become a victim of it. Later on he become Apotex's "safety" 
rep. and a criminally motivated "witness".
. She miss represented herself claiming , that she did on regular bases 
meet with me to discuss safety issues and to do some safety quizzes while 
the truth are that she started her employment with Apotex 3 (three) years 
after I was criminally terminated.
. Ms. K. Koss Provided number of quizzes to WSiB , which she claimed that I 
did complete during employment , while in fact all of them were completed by 
me in one / first day of my employment in 1997.
. Ms. K. Koss altered my personal / Company's medical records withholding / 
canceling all Records indicating my medical problems during my employment
. Ms. K. Koss cancels Company's Record indicating , that I was perfectly 
healthy before my employment with Apotex
. She removed Company's Records generated by Health and Safety Clinic 
recording fact that I never was issued any mask / protective equipment,
. She counseled record, that Company was under construction during my 6,5 
years of employment and all equipment / systems were invalidated/ not 
functional and buildings were substantially demolished with piles of debris 
constantly present in Manufacturing /Packaging areas during processes.
. She concealed fact that during my employment Company did not have a Nurse 
on the stuff NOR OFFICIALY ORGANIZED SAFETY DEPARTMENT.
. Ms. K. Koss CONSEALED FACT , THAT VERY MANY EMPLOYEES SUFERRED DEADLY 
MEDICAL PROBLEMS AS RESULT OF / FROM UNPROTECTED EXPOSURES TO VERY POTENT 
ACTIVES
. She did not disclose that most Apotex's employees from my period of 
employment were temporary and are not employed any more.
. She did not admit as Company's Record show, that I worked with out any 
management, with out any in process quality control, on night shifts and 
that all my allegations are cross referenced by evidence.
. Etc., etc., etc.
*I am asking WSIAT TO PROCESS MY REQUEST OF ALLOVING ME TO PROCIDE WITH 
LEGAL/ CIVIL / CRIMINAL ACTION AGAINST APOTEX IF COMPANY REFUSES TO SETTLE 
MY CLAIM IN SATISFIING TO ME MANNER.
*I AM ASKING WSIAT TO PROCESS MY REQUEST TO ALLOW ME TO PROCEED IN LEGAL 
MANNER AGAINST GOVERNMENT OF ONTARIO AND ANY ONE GUILTY OF CRIMES AGAINST ME 
IF I SELECT TO DO SO.
*I AM REQUESTING FROM APOTEX CERTIFIED CONSENT TO PAY ADDITIONAL money 
($Cn...:) TO MY FAMILY IN CASE OF MY DEATH, UNCONDITIONALLY / REGARDLESS OF 
REASONS /CAUSES of my death, BECAUSE ON ANY CIRCUMSTANCE DIRECTLY / 
INDDIRECTLY MY DEATH WOULD / will BE RESULTING FROM MY MEDICAL CONDITIONS / 
DUE TO WORK RELATED UNPROTECTED EXPOSURES TO advanced structural composite 
materials /chemicals used in the manufacturing processes which have been 
classified as to have a co- carcinogenic and/or synergistic effect and which 
overwhelmed my system. As result of Company's negligence (unprotected 
exposure to a potent immunosuppressant, brain function controlling drugs 
(psychiatric), antidepressants, narcotics, blood pressure /composition 
controlling drugs which overwhelmed my system- I AM DISABLED). Experts 
agree that most cancers are caused by our bodies or parts of them being 
exposed to certain substances over long periods of time. These cancer 
causing substances are called carcinogens.
(NHS 2001). Chemical carcinogens
The chemical agents of cancer have become entrenched in our world in two 
ways: first, and ironically, through man's search for a better and easier 
way of life; second, because the manufacture and sale of such chemicals has 
become an accepted part of our economy and our way of life.
(Carson 1962)
The main source of human exposures to carcinogens today is man-made chemical 
compounds. By 1985 it could be stated as a fact that 'nearly all of the 
synthetic [man-made] chemicals regularly used in industry today did not 
exist 40 years ago [in the 1940s]. Of the 45,000 toxic chemicals listed by 
the US National Institute of Safety and Health (NIOSH) in 1980, 2,500 were 
identified as carcinogens, 2,700 as mutagens [causing genetic change] and 
300 as teratogens [causing malformation of an embryo]. Less than 7,000 had 
been adequately tested.
(Grossart 1985)
This is old, not new knowledge. Yet it was only during the last 15 years of 
the 20th century that medical science began to associate the unprecedented 
growth rates of many diseases with modern chemicals. While in the same 
15-year period some chemical compounds were banned or reduced (in number and 
use) through tighter regulations, man-made chemicals continued to be 
developed and marketed in an ever-widening range of products and 
applications. The universal application of man-made chemicals in every 
sphere of modern life has made exposure to them an unavoidable, lifelong 
reality for each one of us. The vast majority of industrial chemicals have 
never been tested for their potential to cause or promote cancer.
Synthetic chemicals are in some cases proven to harm - and in other cases 
suspected of being harmful - to human health for a range of reasons:
. the majority are based on carbon, and for this reason, are particularly 
dangerous to us because being based on carbon, the chemistry of all life, 
they readily enter human tissues and seriously disrupt the body's complex 
processes and complex chemical reactions.
(Harte et al 'Toxics A-Z' 1991)
. many of those which have been tested are known or suspected carcinogens
. increasing numbers are found to disrupt the function of the endocrine 
(hormone) system. This group has particular significance for hormone-related 
cancers such as breast cancer
. some are both carcinogenic and hormone-disruptive e.g. atrazine, an 
agricultural pesticide widely used in the UK
. the increasing numbers found to 'persist' (remain a long time in the 
environment) as a result of being designed to be 'stable compounds' which 
are therefore not broken down in the environment by micro-organisms and in 
the human body by metabolic processes
. the increasing numbers found to be 'bioaccumulative' (build-up in the 
body, mostly in fatty tissue). Chemical compounds that accumulate in living 
tissues increase in number and concentration as they move up through the 
food chain. It follows therefore, that humans, at the top of the food chain, 
will have the highest concentrations
. the capacity of many to cross the blood-brain and placental barriers
. the increased risk of toxicity resulting from the combined effects of 
synthetic chemicals on the body.
There are:
'adverse effects observable in the pattern of human disease, both in foetal 
malformations and the increase in the incidence of cancer - particularly in 
young people - and we can observe that those changes have taken place over 
the same period of time as the introduction of these novel chemicals.'
(Howard 2004)
Several hundred chemicals are found in a wide range of commercial products 
and conditions we unknowingly encounter in our daily lives. Often overlooked 
by regulators is the variation in effects on a population from similar 
exposures, as recorded by biochemist and cancer researcher Ross Hume Hall: 
'Individuals vary greatly in their susceptibility to toxic chemicals, and 
the differences between men and women can be punishingly large . Women thus 
can fall victim to legal limits of residues of pesticides and waste 
chemicals in their supermarket grapes or in their apple juice. Even at their 
best, EPA [Environmental Protection Agency, USA] regulations disregard the 
susceptibility to cancer of 50 per cent of the population.'
(The Ecologist 1998)
Assured by periodic statements from government and industry about the safety 
of regulated chemicals, and lacking the information to challenge such 
assurances, most of us are quite unaware that: 'little has been done to 
prevent exposure to carcinogenic chemicals in the environment, despite ample 
evidence that chemical pollution of our air, water, food and the workplace 
is the major cause of cancer.'
(Epstein 1990)
Lately, my many medical conditions deteriorated and impose on me a lot of 
difficulties and enormous stress.
During my employment and after I developed array of many very serious 
medical conditions amongst lungs problem (due to product side effects- 
reported to Superiors and documented). My autonomic function of lungs (a 
function of the respiratory cycles) has been compromised.
More and more frequently I am stopping to breathe with out a warning. These 
are relatively short in duration episodes but I am not in control of them. 
Despite my conscious mind I struggle in-vein to take air and I can not make 
my lungs to move. I suspect that my neurons / neurotransmitters are affected 
/ damaged (altered function / communication) by active ingredients at work.
As result of all my medical conditions I fear, that such undertaking as a 
trip for a hearing may end up for me fatally. For very long time I do not go 
any where at all (I am bedridden).
I scrolled trough Tribunal's website and I discovered, that Tribunal's extra 
ordinary powers do allow Tribunal to make its own rules of proceedings which 
allow performing Hearings in any way where appropriate ( "any part of a 
proceeding may be conducted in person or by way of a written hearing or 
electronically). The Tribunal may exercise any of its powers under these 
Rules on its own initiative or at the request of a party as well the 
Tribunal may waive or vary the application of any of these Rules where 
appropriate").
Due to my circumstance, written format would be the best for me.
Practice Direction:
"Powers of Practice and Procedure 2.3.2.2 Choosing the Method of Resolution
The ARO, in consultation with the parties, will determine whether to proceed 
by written
submissions (also called a "non-appearance hearing") or by an oral hearing. 
The Board seems to prefer non-appearance hearings.
AROs will generally discourage oral hearings."
Respondent's all alleged "preliminary" issues do not stand up to my 
conformed allegations and due to fact that I did forward all evidence 
challenging alleged issues as well as due to fact, that Respondent admitted 
all my allegations I am asking Tribunal, whether it is absolutely necessary 
for me to attend in person the hearing on Respondent's issues which are not 
valid and serve Respondent as a tool to challenge my Application on 
technicalities.
I am asking Tribunal to explore / implement alternative method of proceeding 
(if possible) to allow me some physical and emotional relief and conclude my 
Application in favorable for me manner.
Due to fact, that I do not have any legal representation and due to fact 
that Apotex subjected me to the most horrifying experiences imaginable - 
Company criminally concealed names/ nature of processed products. Company 
processed products with out regulatory permits in Facility not approved for 
those products (not providing any personal protection for Personnel), did 
not post Safety Data Shits , Work Orders and did not disclose short and long 
term health hazards do to massive unprotected exposures) and ever since it 
denied me medical help, I was /am under influence / heavily impaired on 
psychiatric / antidepressants, narcotics and other very potent medications 
(conditions may not be reversible and may last a life time ) I will not be 
able to effectively / aggressively defend my self in articulated manner due 
to medical condition (severely reduced motor skills, abnormal vision, my 
brain feels as if it's "swimming inside of my skull, significantly 
compromised speech mechanism, frequent thought blockages, memory 
disturbances and many more of other serious neurological problems. I can not 
comprehend / rationalize almost any thing on the spot. It takes long time 
for me to " get it"
Best Regards,
(Apotex's victim)
Pc:
CIVIL LIABILITY ARISING FROM BAD FAITH
The concept of bad faith
"Bad faith" also has not been given a precise definition by the Canadian 
courts. However, it has been frequently associated with actions involving 
malice, fraud, collusion, illegal conduct, dishonesty, abuse of power, 
discrimination, unreasonable conduct, ill-motivated conduct or procedural 
unfairness.
Justice Southin in the case of MacMillan Bloedel Ltd. v. Galiano Island 
Trust Committee3 articulated the concept of bad faith as follows:
The words bad faith have been used in municipal and administrative case law 
to cover a wide range of conduct in the exercise of legislatively delegated 
authority. Bad faith has been held to include dishonesty, fraud, bias, 
conflict of interest, discrimination, abuse of power, corruption, 
oppression, unfairness, and conduct that is unreasonable. The words have 
also been held to include conduct based on an improper motive, or undertaken 
for an improper, indirect or ulterior purpose. In all these senses, bad 
faith describes the exercise of delegated authority that is illegal, and 
renders the consequential act void. And in all these senses bad faith must 
be proven by evidence of illegal conduct, adequate to support the finding of 
fact.
*Complaints Against the Government of Ontario
Complaints against the Government of Ontario should name the respondents as 
follows:
Her Majesty the Queen, in right of Ontario, as represented by the
Minister of ________ and (any personal respondents).
. The Government Ministry representing the Crown should be described in the 
particulars of the complaint, but the complaint should cite the Minister, by 
title (not by his or her personal name, e.g., Sally Martin) and should not 
cite the Ministry. In rare cases, where the Minister himself or herself is 
alleged to have directly been involved in the discrimination (e.g., a claim 
of sexual harassment) he or she can be named personally.
. The Complaint against the Provincial Crown will be served on the director 
of the Legal Services Branch of the Ministry in question.
. The Deputy Minister should not be named as a personal respondent unless he 
or she had involvement in the circumstances surrounding the allegations in 
the complaint and would otherwise be named as a personal respondent in 
keeping with Commission practice.

-----------------------------------------
I POST SOME QUOTES FROM WSiB's MEMOS. I begged Apotex - Employer / WSiB to release name of a product which caused explosion and subsequent fire and which directly affected me in very dramatic way so I could get some help and stop rapid and very horrifying deterioration of my health, but I was refused any consideration!  PRODUCTION CONFIDENTIALITY ISSUES!
Regards,
Apotex's /WSiB's victim

​PC: 

Ron McArthur - Apotex’s Senior Vice President

During news media interview (2002 ) Apotex’s Senior Vice President , Operations Ron McArthur offered a very liberal description / assessment of internal situation / non compliance as a Standard Operational Procedure ( SOP ) WITH IN THIS Organization ( Apotex ) which by its nature invalidated all Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). All ingredients (actives, controlled substances and every thing else together on the floors in manufacturing (MFG) / Packaging (PKG) areas / all over.
Apotex for years sacrificed own employees AND FOR MANY YEARS very negatively impacted unfortunate, afflicted, and very much suffering vulnerable people / health products consumers.
Scores of them were pushed over the edge by contamination, over dose (luck of actives) etc.
Justice was not served for those affected those who perished in agony / their families / General Public (somebody’s loved ones) often spending last pennies on meds which suppose to help.
Construction / expansion created mayhem for 6 + years.
Ron McArthur actually provided some real matrix / matrices.