Toxicologist Mitchell W. Souerhoff- Souerhoff & Associates works on his own for 15 years and has no clue what side effects are of new and old chemicals.
In my Case the situation vividly illustrates fundamental problems regarding Public safety in matters of health care.
My case indicates that problems it illustrates have not yet been satisfactorily resolved across the Country or else ware.
However it has useful role in raising Public awareness of adverse corporate influence on Society and relevant Government Agencies.
It will have useful role as a catalyst to stimulate progress on improving measures to protect the safety of the Public at the local, National and International levels.
For this is necessary to commission an independent inquiry.
New significant steps need to be taken to ensure that individual or institutional conflict of interest would be promptly identified and managed.
Production / profit driven Culture? developed factors leading to corrupt practices entering in to some scientific / manufacturing endeavours, with not merely unfortunate , but tragic consequences.
The information provided by SOUERHOFF & Associates is false, inaccurate or otherwise misleading/fraudulent.
In materials provided by me I did address in depth/with support of hard evidence all what I do allege.
Grave actions were taken by Apotex against me.
Mitchell W. Souerhoff is NOT a Medical Doctor and he provided dishonest analyses in connection with my Case.
He supposes to be rejected as a witness for provision of favourable to Apotex statements which are not supported by any scientific material / Clinical Trial.
Sourhof & Associates did not have access to raw data of my Case.
Dr. Souerhoff was impeded by contractual / monetary compensation Agreement with Apotex.
Governments must improve defence of Public interest in such cases.
Apotex describing itself as a major Generic/Brand Company has NO regard to my and Public safety.
This is very disturbing situation.
Souerhoff & Associates / Dr. Souerhoff IS NOT an expert QUALIFIED TO TESTIFY IN MY CASE!
Either Mitchell W. Souerhoff nor his Firm Souerhoff & Associates are equipped; do not have any independent expertise or authority to provide any opinions or conclusions in regard to aggravating side effects of any chemicals / compounds, especially about chemicals / actives used in pharmaceutical industry TODAY.
Either Mitchell Souerhoff nor his Firm DO HAVE PERMITS /CAPACITIES TO CONDUCT ANY EXPERIMENTS / Clinical Trials either on animals or human subjects to have any independent Data/ Expertise in pharmaceutical field.
Mitchell Souerhoff has his fingers every were where he can make a buck or associate himself with for self promotion.
He utilizes selected/manipulated Data available in Public domain which originates from designed, controlled , purged , suppressed and / or strictly controlled Clinical Trials conducted almost exclusively by Pharmaceutical Companies themselves (please look into data included in my Files).
Usually info about aggravating / lethal side effects is suppressed / concealed by party / Pharmaceutical Companies ordering / conducting / interpreting the Clinical Trial.
Dr. Souerhoff opinionated my Case not being qualified to do so and he did this based on bias information provided to him by Apotex / Counsel Carl Peterson (LLP).
There are no standard speciality tests available / developed to determine any at all impacts of chemicals / actives on human body.
There is absence of objective tests!
Additionally despite request, that in accordance with WSIAT Practice Direction if evidence includes a Report of a Doctor or other Expert that has been specifically prepared for Appeal one must submit a copy of the CURRICULUM VITEA (QUALIFICATIONS) OF THE DOCTOR/EXPERT AND A COPY OF A Letter send to the Doctor / Expert requesting the Report / Testimony as well as address /location of a Doctor / Expert.
Counsel Carl Peterson did not / does not provide any of those.
Mitchell W. Souerhoff and his Firm Souerhoff & Associates are providing Testimonials INCOGNITO not reviling own locations / addresses.
The fact is that BESIDE VISIBLE EXTERNAL DAMMAGE TO THE SKIN / HUMAN BODY, ONLY POSTMORTEM FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY CAN (AND does it IN very LIMITED MANNER) DETERMINE SOME INTERNAL DAMAGE TO THE CNN / HUMAN BODY AS RESULT OF TOXIC EXPOSURE.
No data can be obtained about adverse effects on physiology or metabolism of individual cells / systems etc.
For example, the toxicity of centrally acting drugs /actives leading to accumulation of toxic concentrations and exerting complex vasoactive effect on the vascular smooth muscles can and does result in immediate or delayed death etc, etc, etc.
There are many different types of chemical injury, including chemical burns, chemical poisoning and allergies arising from chemical exposure, along with a huge range of possible symptoms. The length / severity of exposure to the toxic chemical will also affect the type of chemical injury sustained by the victim. Those are some of my injuries.
All of I allege I did substantiate by hard evidence, Doctor's diagnoses, witness statements, Government Agencies investigations and all what Apotex's Counsel states I did successfully repelled with my submissions contained in my Case Records and Addendums.
Apotex / Counsel / Witness â€“Toxicologist are purposely omitting critical information, misinterpreting, disseminating other, ignoring my previous submissions etc.
Apotex /Counsel / Toxicologist (DEFENDANT- OFENDER) DO SELLECT SENTENCES from Doctors statements OUT OF CONTEXT IN SUPPORT OF OWN CRIMINAL AGENDA.
Counsel/Toxicologist in criminal manner takes / copies sentences from multiple documents / Doctor's statements and assembles them in to one paragraph misleading WSIAT.
Counsel Carl Peterson (LLP) pretends that such false comment / diagnoses were made by a Doctor.
Example of such fabrication is in Counsel's Letter to WSIAT dated Jan 31/2012 on top of Page 3.
Carl Peterson pretends that those are raw quotas of Dr.XXXX's correspondences etc.
In general all info contained in Counsel's submissions on Jan 31/2012 is criminally compromised / manipulated / falsified to the point of not submissability / acceptance for consideration.
Also Carl Peterson lies / misleads WSIAT in his Letter dated Feb 15 /2012 about relevant Regulations / Law as about every thing else he did in my case during almost 9 years of Apotex's / his reign of terror against me a disabled Ontarian.
More about "TOXICOLOGIST": http://www.pharmaholocaust.com/APOTEX-S-CRIMINAL-TESTIMONY.html
Also look at: http://www.pharmaholocaust.com/SAMPLE-1.html
Check index for more on Paxil. Paxil it is only a sample of Apotex's very many deadly product.
Check index for Sample 1-6 and more.