Apotex - contamination     www.apotexholocaust.com            www.pharmaholocaust.com
I live like a walking death in twilight zone / some where in between death and a life being deprived of all Human Rights and Constitutional / Law 
protection by habitual offenders. I was assessed by three (3) independent psychiatrists to eliminate offender's speculations about my insanity 
prompting "delusions" etc. All psychiatrists stated clearly, that I am sane /I do NOT have/had any mental illness. No family history of any.
Apotex's behavior / fraud as well as Counsel's Mr.Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP ) unlawful acts such as:

Dear Sir / Madam, 


Apotex's behavior / fraud as well as Counsel's Mr.Carl Peterson (Filion 
Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP ) unlawful acts such as:
"Mr.Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP - Apotex ) did 
knowingly and willfully make a materially false, fictitious and fraudulent 
statements and representation in a matter within the jurisdiction of the 
Ontario Labor Board / Ministry of Labour, WSiB (Workers Compensation 
Insurance Board), WSIAT, Ontario Human Rights Commission /Tribunal ("The 
Superior Court struck down the "fatally flawed" decision as so unfair to 
defendant Maxcine Telfer - who represented herself in the hearing - that it 
was "simply not possible to logically follow the pathway taken by the 
adjudicator." In my Case OHRT engaged in fraud and criminal conspiracy 
etc.), Ombudsmen Ontario, , obstructed Ontario Health Act, Ontario Labor Law 
as well as Canadian Constitution etc.
Mr.Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP - Apotex) committed 
many counts of perverting the course of justice or intending to pervert the 
course of justice, many counts of perjury, criminal conspiracy (Suppression 
of information / evidence about Adulterated Drugs and / or Failing to Follow 
Manufacturing Procedures, SOP / GMP /FDA Regulations, ROUTINE CONTAMINATION 
/ CROSS CONTAMINATION by Apotex etc.), criminal negligence, criminal 
recruitment of false witnesses, attempted murder, did cause /contribute to 
permanent disability, irreparable damage, become accessory to Domestic 
/Global terrorism / crimes against Humanity."
will focus US Justice Department on this Corporation. Is gona be almost as 
if Apotex would have a large red target painted on it.
The Department of Justice has focused heavily upon pharmaceutical industry.
Facing a Justice Department suit is a very expensive proposition.
In 2009, one settlement alone topped $2 billion, including criminal fines 
and civil settlements.
There is a huge incentive for employees of a pharmaceutical company to turn 
in the company.
Justice Department has been dangling the carrot of incentive to bring 
these types of cases.
Just what are the greatest compliance risks to a pharmaceutical company?
The government has honed in on three primary areas where it alleges that a 
pharmaceutical company commits fraud, but recently added up a very important 
to public's Safety AREA # 4 :
Adulterated Drugs or Failing to Follow Manufacturing Procedures!
An emerging area of pharmaceutical fraud is adulterated products.
This is not the same thing as using ingredients that are dangerous.
The FDA has strict rules (?) and requirements (?) that apply to every drug 
manufacturer..............:).
Before a drug is approved, the pharmaceutical company must not only test the 
drug and prove its effectiveness, but it must establish tight manufacturing 
procedures and controls. Once approved, the company may not deviate from 
that strict process. Any changes must be pre-approved by the FDA.
If a company skips steps or does not conduct each required manufacturing 
test and protocol, the drug is technically altered or "adulterated." In 
other words, if a company tells the FDA that it will use sterile labs and 
certain processes but then chooses not to use them because they are 
expensive etc., the drugs are non-conforming. The FDA treats them as 
adulterated.
In U.S. Medicare and Medicaid have rules that prohibit paying for 
adulterated products. Therefore, if a manufacturer significantly deviates 
from the approved process, it is not eligible to sell the drugs to the 
government.
This may be the biggest area of compliance risk . However, it is one to be 
watchful for because DOJ has been dangling the carrot of incentive to bring 
these types of cases.
It is just a matter of time before adulterated product fraud allegations 
become almost common place.
The standard of proof in a False Claims Act case is "preponderance of the 
evidence", i.e., the claim is more likely true than not. This is the same 
burden of proof ordinarily applicable in most civil cases, and is easier to 
meet than the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard used in criminal cases.
EXAMPLE:
"GlaxoSmithKilne-- $600,000,000 under the False Claims Act
In October of 2010, GlaxoSmithKline agreed to pay $750 million to settle a 
case involving systematic deceit related to product contamination and dosage 
irregularities at GSK's plant in Cidra, Puerto Rico. Drugs affected 
include Paxil, Avandia, Avandament, Coreg, Bactroban, Abreva, Cimetidine, 
Compazine, Denavir, Dyazide, Thorazine, Stelazine, Ecotrin, Tagamet, 
Relafen, Kytril, Factive, Dyrenium, and Albenza. Of the $750 million 
settlement, $600 million was civil and $150 million was a criminal penalty."
**********
Protection from Retaliation on the Job
Harassment or ostricization by management and fellow employees is common in 
such situations, and the people may even be fired, demoted, or suspended (in 
my case also disabled amongst many other aggravating / criminal acts).
Justice Department provides a remedy for "victims"who are discharged, 
demoted, suspended, "or in any other manner discriminated against in the 
terms and conditions of employment by his or her employer" in retaliation 
for expressing concerns / filing a Justice Department case.
If the court finds an employee was terminated or otherwise mistreated for 
filing a lawsuit, the employee is at least entitled to reinstatement at the 
same seniority level as if he or she had never left the company, two times 
the amount of back pay owed plus interest, and compensation for any "special 
damages" sustained as a result of the discrimination / retaliation, such as 
attorneys' fees etc.
ALSO DO PLAY ROLE OTHER FACTORS :
EMPLOYMENT STANDARDS ACT PROVISIONS
BODILY INJURY PROVISIONS -CIVIL LAW SUIT,
CRIMINAL ACT PROVISIONS
HUMAN RIGHTS PROVISIONS
CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS
against terrorism /crimes against Humanity provisions etc., etc., etc.
Regards,
(Apotex's/ WSiB's / Government's of Ontario victim